Return to the Electrical Wiring Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra opening?

Posted by chesdin2 (My Page) on
Sun, Jul 25, 10 at 18:18

I would like to tap into an existing single gang nonmetallic box that currently contains a receptacle but is at its box-fill limit (at 18 cu. in.). The reason for tapping in is to add a receptacle on the opposite side of the same interior wall. The existing box currently has a receptacle, two 14-2 cables, and a 14-3 cable, so I believe it is at its max.

I want to add one more 14-2, so I think I now need 22 cu. in. total, so a 25 cu. in. double gang box would do the trick. But how do I keep things from looking weird? (It's on a bedroom wall.) An easy thing would be to add another receptacle side-by-side (taking the box fill to 24 cu. in.), but that would look funny in a bedroom. I would hate to have a blank plate covering half the box.

I'm sure this has happened before... I would appreciate any ideas. Thanks!


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra open

Have you considered moving one of the 14-2 cables to the new box and installing a 14-2 between the boxes, thus not affecting the box fill of the original box.


 o
RE: Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra open

You know, that is a good idea. I should be able to do that with no problems, given that one of the cables is "passing through" the circuit to the next box. I think if I can find which of them has the most slack, I can just relocate that one. The good news is that I am not concerned about cutting out drywall if I have to.

Thanks for the suggestion!


 o
RE: Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra open

If you don't care about the drywall. Cut out a hole, mount a 4&11/16" by 4&11/16" square box with a 1/2" deep single gang mud ring. Then repair the sheet rock cutting out a hole only around the mud ring. That will give you a massive box with only a single gang opening.


 o
RE: Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra open

Spencer, thank you for the suggestion. I will be able to use that approach in another room where I also have a box-fill issue.


 o
RE: Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra open

Spencer is giving away a lot of secret tricks.

This is how you get minimum depth when needed.

A 1.25 inch deep square box with a plaster ring.

Meets fill, a little bit of trouble to work in through the plaster ring.


 o
RE: Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra open

I appreciate having folks like both of you who take the time to help others out. I try to "pay it forward" by posting helpful things on other sites and I enjoy doing it, but when it comes to electrical I'm more of a "trainee". (Though I bought one of those NEC summary books a while back which has been really useful.)

I used the square box-plastic ring combo some time ago when I was doing some different work (on an exposed joist): I wanted to mount a receptacle directly on the square box and that seemed the best way to do it. It never occurred to me to use that arrangement behind drywall, but I can see that it will work well.

Thanks again.


 o
RE: Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra open

When you have a tight space metal boxes shine.

The plastic boxes are enough larger at the same volume (thicker walls) that they sometimes just will not fit.

I have gone as far as drilling a hole for the box bonding screw into the material behind the box.

Old work requires a lot of tricks.


 o
RE: Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra open

... receptacle, two 14-2 cables, and a 14-3 cable... I believe that already puts you over the max fill limit.


 o
RE: Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra open

Normel: I thought the math was: 2" per conductor except all grounds count as one, plus 2" for the device, so:

4 x 2 and 3 x 2 for the current carrying conductors = 14
All grounds = 2
Device = 2
Total = 18, which fills the 18" box.

Is the correct math different?


 o
RE: Upsizing from Single Gang to 2X: Good way to cover extra open

Better late han never... I wanted to get back to you guys and thank you for the great suggestions. I used the "square box with plaster ring" method and it worked nicely. Not only is it necessary for code compliance not to exceed box fill, but it sure is easier to work when you have all that volume to fit the wires!

Anyway, thanks again.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Electrical Wiring Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here