Return to the Electrical Wiring Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
220V malfunction puzzler

Posted by mattman_83 (My Page) on
Tue, Jan 29, 13 at 20:45

So we have a few 20A 220V outlets in our shop (new construction as of 3yrs ago). We recently ran our new dust collector on one of these outlets and an odd thing consistently happens. Every-other time we turn on the machine, it flips the breaker. The machine is well below the 20A max and it runs consistently in any other outlet in the shop (every outlet has its own breaker). After we reset the breaker, the first time we turn on the machine it runs great - no problems running it as long as we want. Turn off the machine and then turn it back on - the breaker flips. NOW, to make this more interesting, if we unplug the machine (even quickly) between attempts, it runs fine. I am really hoping this all makes sense to someone, because it has me stumped...


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

How many times has this behavior repeated? If only a hand-full of times, I have to question whether your observations are statistically significant. If that is the case, you could just have a weak breaker out of the box. I've seen it happen.


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

What is the motor rating (on the nameplate0 of the dust collector?

Motor loads have their own special NEC Article.

The chief difference is that conductors are sized based on the motor full load running (FLR) current, and breakers are then multiples of the FLR, often by a couple hundreds of percent depending on the breaker type.

The motor contains its own thermal overload protection.
The breaker is just short circuit protection of the feeder wires to the motor.

It sounds like the starting current (Locked Rotor Amps, LRA) is larger than the breaker can tolerate.

The large rotor being started up from a stop prolongs the start-up surge significantly.


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

ionized: We have run the cyclone probably a couple dozen times. EVERY time this is the result, without any variation. First attempt - cyclone runs; second attempt - breaker flips. We have tested the Unplug Between Attempts Method probably a dozen times and it starts every time, no variation in the results. I understand statistics, and the likelihood of this exact same failure detail happening 20 times in a row -yet not being significant- is nil. But hey, I can fully appreciate healthy skepticism :) The bad breaker idea sounds very possible, I just dont understand why the load is different between attempts or unplugging.

brickeyee: The machine has a 2hp (14A) induction motor. If the problem were the machine, it seems like it should trip the breaker on any of the other identical 20A 220V dedicated circuits (which it does not). We have 3hp induction motor machines (table saw and shaper) that have never once tripped their breakers. We have not tested these other machines on the dust collector's circuit due to mobility.


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

Buying another breaker should not break the bank. Or you could interchange the conductors between breakers in the panel to put the dust collector on a different breaker. Per Table 430-52, that dust collector could be on a circuit protected by a 30 amp breaker.


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

The time delay curve of breaker is pretty far from uniform.

There is significant variation slowed from breaker to breaker.

If it works on one breaker but not another, try exchanging the breakers.


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

I agree with brickeye that the difference between the receptacles, is probably a difference on the delay curve of the beakers to each receptacle.

I also agree with bus driver, even without knowing the LRA, that it appears it should probably be on a 30 amp breaker.

In addressing the first time/second time issue of start-up, I'd speculate that the start-up capacitor, on the the first attempt is bringing in a large current rush, but on the second attempt it has still retained some charge and now has a lower inrush current.


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

You probbaly do not have to change the conductor size to use a 30 amp breaker for a motor only load.

You should review article 460.
SHOULD BE ARTICLE 430.

Even the current ratings on the motor nameplate are not used.

The NEC has its own horsepower to full load current table in the article that MUST be used.

This post was edited by brickeyee on Fri, Feb 1, 13 at 10:38


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

"You should review article 460."

Brick, are you sure you didn't mean article 430-6?


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

Is this on a Square D Homeline by chance?
I won't go into why I'm asking right now, just curious if it is.


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

"are you sure you didn't mean article 430-6?"

Article 430 is correct.

Office is packed and memory is failing.


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

Well we tested the circuit, wiring it to different breaker (known to work) and everything was great - so we bought a replacement. So far so good. Thanks to everyone for your help.
hexus: Yes it was (and still is) a Square D Homeline. Spooky...how did you know (and should I be worried).


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

"hexus: Yes it was (and still is) a Square D Homeline. Spooky...how did you know (and should I be worried)."

LOL! I KNEW IT!

I've had VERY similar issues with Homeline's. So much in fact that I stopped using them. I used to have several temporaries that I built using Homeline's and I've installed them on a few jobs. I ALWAYS would have issues with motor loads on them (compressors, saws, etc...)
I've had Square D reps swear to me up and down that Homelines are exactly the same internally as QO's minus the little red flag and the indicator window, but I've never had issues with QO's like I have with Homeline's.
I'm sure for most people Homeline's are fine and work perfectly, for me though I couldn't afford all the call backs I was getting with motor loads on them.

Please note I'm not trashing them or bad mouthing them at all, I've just had very similar issues with them on motor loads and couldn't afford all the calls backs I was getting.


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

hexus: Well good to know. We have another workshop room that has a compressor and vac pump. If we have this issue again, I will go with a different type.


 o
RE: 220V malfunction puzzler

Sounds like they have a tighter than typical inverse-time overload curve.

On anything except motors that would be a mark of better quality.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Electrical Wiring Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here