|
| I've seen a couple of recommendations on panel layout and I was wondering if there' a conscensus on design or does everyone just do it "their way" and it doesn't really matter.
Some say stack all the 2-pole breakers on the right side and others say to alternate them at the top. My current GE panel has them all on the right but I'm thinking of putting them at the top with my QO panel. Seems to me if you stack them that would be worse from a heat buildup perspective since 2-pole breakers are heavier loads and generate more heat... and each one would affect the one above and so on. It would also seem that placing the heavier loads at the top where they are closer to the start of the power busses would be better. Thoughts? Would love to see some pictures of various designs. Thanks. |
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| "Seems to me if you stack them that would be worse from a heat buildup " Not an issue "It would also seem that placing the heavier loads at the top where they are closer to the start of the power busses would be better." Put the breakers any which way you like. If there was any potential problem the manufacturer would have to specify that in the instructions. They don't and there isn't. |
|
- Posted by petey_racer (My Page) on Sun, Jan 31, 10 at 19:04
| Second everything BB said. |
|
| 2-pole breakers pull from both legs to access 240 V so there position does not really matter. Even single pole breakers are normally pretty self balancing in a residential panel since every other slot on both sides is the opposite leg, and very large loads are 240 V anyway. |
|
- Posted by tom_in_seattle (My Page) on Sun, Jan 31, 10 at 20:58
| Thanks guys. I guess I will just do it "my way" :-) The main reason I asked is there are conflicting opinions on what is "right." I was speaking to a retired electrician the other day and when I told him I was going to stack all the double pole breakers on the right he was really against that because of what he claimed was a potential heat issue, but that opinion is probably just that, an opinion. As bigbird said if this was an issue the panel manufacturer would spell it out. |
|
| The only thing you may consider, if your panel has specific slots for tandem breakers, is that you not put double pole breakers in these slots... makes thing more difficult to rearrange if you need tandems later. |
|
- Posted by ronnatalie (My Page) on Mon, Feb 1, 10 at 10:35
| I fill from the top down because it's easier to knock out the tabs out of the panel if they are contiguous. |
|
| "The only thing you may consider, if your panel has specific slots for tandem breakers, is that you not put double pole breakers in these slots... makes thing more difficult to rearrange if you need tandems later." normel makes a good point here. That is the only reason I try to keep the two pole brkrs toward the top because most panels I am aware of that allow tandem breakers make provisions for them at the bottom most section of breaker spaces. This is evidenced by the slot in the buss in the last 6 or so breaker spaces. Otherwise, as everyone else said, it's really up to you. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Electrical Wiring Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.