| Good morning Kate, Great question – err – questions. It appears that you have really done your research into this issue so I will try to add a little bit to it. PGT is the 800lb gorilla in the Florida impact market, but they are not the only option. I say that NOT as a recommendation or not recommendation of any specific window company, but simply as a statement of fact. In the last 10 years or so PGT has gone from a window company not on anyone’s map to one of the 10 largest window companies in North America. Tremendous growth and a very large percentage of that growth has been in the impact market. Off the top-of-my-head, I can’t think of any window company who meets Energy Star with a typical Dade certified window. There may be some out there, but if so there aren’t very many. And as a quick aside…IG means Insulating Glass. Technically all dual pane windows are referred to as IG units. I had the impression from your question that you were seeing impact dual pane as "IG" and non impact as "dual pane". Not sure if I was correct in reading it that way, but just in case – a small explanation. A good part of the reason is that most windows certified to the Dade standard were constructed using monolithic impact glass (the correct term) rather than IG impact glass. Not exclusively of course, but most companies that certified to the Dade standard did so by dropping a single pane of laminated glass into there sash/frame system. This works great for impact protection; but not quite as well in terms of window energy performance. In the South Florida environment, many folks conclude that SHGC is more important than is U-factor. I totally agree. In the South Florida environment many folks conclude that SHGC is the holy grail of window energy performance and that U-factor is of no importance. There I don’t agree. But, the folks who write the codes tend to ignore U-factor in South Florida as having no application – seeing it as a northern climate issue – and so U-factor was never a factor in the older (and some more recent) energy codes in that area. That may change in the future or it may not. We shall see… Standard LowE has very little application in a severe cooling environment such as South Florida. That is why LowE2 (more correctly as LoE^2 "squared") was developed. Although LowE2 is used generically for this type of coating, LoE^2 was developed by Cardinal and they "own" the correct designation. Kind of like using "coke" for all cola products even though Coke is certainly a brand identifier. Standard LowE blocks far or longwave infrared radiation which translates into heat that you feel when exposed to a hot sidewalk (for example) when the sun has been shining on it. In this example you could call it reradiated heat. LowE2 was developed to block shortwave or near infrared energy as well as longwave infrared. Shortwave IR energy translates into direct solar heat gain – which is what you want to block. Does it work? Yep, and very well, too. However, I would recommend in your situation that you investigate LowE3 which is the newest version of solar control LowE coating on the market. Again, LowE3 is used as a generic term. Cardinal designates there triple solar control as LoE366 (it was the original on the market and it does have the best energy performance numbers of the triple coatings out there). You might also run across someone using one of AFG’s Comfort Ti-AC solar coatings or perhaps PPG’s Solarban 70XL. I mention Cardinal’s coatings for a couple of reasons. First, like PGT in Florida, Cardinal is the 800lb gorilla of the residential coating market, owning something like double the North American share of that market than every other coating company combined – so it is more than twice as likely that you will be offered a Cardinal LoE coating when buying energy performance windows than another coating (and of course, that being said, you will likely come across one of the others in your research…) And second, because Cardinal’s coating designations are really easy to read. For example LoE366 means that the coating has three layers of silver and it transmits 66% of visible light. Can a LowE coating be placed inside a laminated glass make-up? Yes. And does that make-up have SHGC numbers comparable to an IG with a solar control coating? Again – yes. Does that make-up offer U-factor numbers comparable to using an IG window? In this case – no. A monolithic laminated glass construction with an enclosed LowE coating will offer comparable SHGC performance numbers to a coated IG unit, but the U-factor is a non-factor in that case, being about the same as a clear monolithic laminated glass of the same make-up sans the LowE coating. Now things become a bit more "interesting". Impact (or "hurricane") windows are made with laminated glass, upgraded hardware, upgraded frames and other components, and all sealed in place with some of the strongest silicone (or other) adhesives on the market. Virtually all the major window manufacturers have impact products available. Some perform extremely well, others barely get by. Laminated glass is simply two (or more) lites of glass bonded to a plastic interlayer for strength. Laminated glass is no stronger against breakage than is the glass it is made of. In other words, laminated glass breaks as easily as the glass it is made of. I mention this because many folks have the mistaken impression that laminated glass / impact windows don’t break very easily. They will break as easily as the glass that they are made of, but the advantage of laminated is that the glass adheres to the plastic interlayer and keeps the envelope of the home closed. All that said, there is a little difference in breakage because a ½" laminated glass (overall thickness) made up of two ¼" lites bonded to the interlayer, is pressure rated the same as a ½" lite – and not as a ¼" lite. I am not sure if that makes sense, if not I can try to explain it better. There are a number of options in the impact glass world relating to the interlayers used to manufacture the laminates – and here are some of those options: First we have PVB or Polyvinyl Butyral. This is the stuff that is in the windshield of your car. It is relatively soft and very flexible, yet it is also tough and doesn’t tear easily. This is probably the most widely used product in the impact glass market since it does great when impacted. It stops whatever hits it and stretches to absorb the impact (such as a persons head in a car accident). PVB is a good product and is the choice for many manufacturers. A second interlayer type is a hybrid of PVB with a layer of PET film between the PVB layers. This is a very tough product and it performs very nicely. A third type of interlayer is called SGP or Sentry Glass Plus. This is quite a bit different from PVB in that it is very stiff and very tough. It is becoming something of the product of choice in some of the toughest applications (including some bullet and bomb resistance applications). It is also can be more than a bit more expensive than PVB and may be overkill for some residential applications – but I think it is ultimately the best product on the market at this date. SGP has become the product of choice for a number of the wood window manufacturers. Although vinyl folks don’t seem to be using it quite as much yet, SGP does seem to be growing in the vinyl market as well. I suspect that one reason SGP is a little behind in vinyl windows is because SGP’s rigidity tends to transfer the impact force to the frame of the window rather than absorbing the impact in the glass as does PVB. While the best vinyl windows can handle the force of an impact when using SGP as the laminate interlayer, not all vinyl windows are strong enough to take that force. And a fourth type is the liquid resin laminates. And I will leave that one where it is. This part becomes a bit sticky…Cardinal, the largest residential coating company in the world and one of the largest, if not the largest, residential laminator in North America, does not offer a monolithic PVB laminated product with an enclosed laminated LowE coating. But, they do offer their coatings in an SGP laminated lite. Beyond that, I have no comment. Either vinyl or aluminum frames will perform well in your environment…depending of course on the quality of the frame and the materials. Aluminum is less energy efficient, even with a thermal break, but many folks are convinced that aluminum is more appropriate to the harsh sun and salt air environment in coastal areas. I would likely consider both and look at the individual performance numbers before making a decision based on material. Also, you might take a look into fiberglass windows. Fiberglass is the newest entry into the sash/frame market and it is a very nice product. Okay, way long, so stopping now. I hope this helps… |