Shop Products
Houzz Logo Print
435_wedgie

Replacement Windows vs New Construction Windows

435_wedgie
12 years ago

I am in process of getting estimates on replacing the windows in my house. And my question is related to which type to get, replacement or new constructions. The house is 35-40 yrs old and original windows. Some of sills are in pretty bad shape, so after 35 yrs there is probably some type of damage underneath, that is why I am leaning towards new construction windows. But some of the contractors are trying to sell me replacement. My fear is the unknown, what damage am I not seeing with going with replacement. This is a long term if not forever house. Need an objective view point. All comments and thoughts are welcome

Comments (6)

  • skydawggy
    12 years ago

    Depends on how bad of shape the frames are in and how many windows you have. Replacements are going to cost less because the labor is more to do a new construction install. OTOH don't let them talk you into replacements and leave you with the possibility of water penetration or not addressing all the potential rotted wood.

  • danvirsse
    12 years ago

    I'd try to stick with new construction, if you can afford the installation costs. There is usually minimal difference in the cost of the windows. It is more invasive, therefore more costly in install the new construction type. I'm in complete agreement with you concerning the integrity of the existing sills and frames.
    Good luck and let us know how it all pans out.

  • GulfBreezeWindows
    12 years ago

    I know what your probably going to say, but what kind of windows do you have now (wood, aluminum etc) and what kind of exterior is your house (brick, wood, vinyl etc)?

  • WedgieonSedgie
    12 years ago

    Everything is wood. The exterior is shingle. The contractor's think probably absteosis. I have some extra shingle from the prior owner. Also, the contractor said if that runs out he can use cement board for the time being until I side the house. Which I anticpate within the year. I understand the cost differential between the two, but if I can swing the additional $1000-$2000 to get the benefits of new constuction windows isn't that worth it? Or am I missing something. Financial this is a one shot deal. Can't afford to have issues 5 yrs down the road and then have a contractor tell me he needs to redo the window, because rot and water damage.

  • PRO
    Windows on Washington Ltd
    12 years ago

    Rotted sills are pretty commonplace and most of the rot that people see is often times draining behind the exterior cladding of the home and therefore not rotting structure. You need to take a closer look (i.e. remove some exterior cladding and inspect structure or remove the sill and take a look at the rough opening).

    While the rot may look significant, a majority of what is out there is non-structural and therefore does not require a full tear out. If you go full tear out, you absolutely should use a flanged/new construction window.

    Having asbestos siding certainly complicates matters a bit and you would be well advised to check code requirements as it pertains to that specific ACM (Asbestos containing material). There are more stringent requirements if the material is removed professionally (i.e. by a contractor) as compared to the homeowner (not all together dissimilar than the RRP fiasco).

  • GulfBreezeWindows
    12 years ago

    +1 you should remove some siding and cladding in the area of a window or two that show some signs of rot. See if it is beyond the window framing and into the structure of the house. Base your decision there.

    If the contractor or you decide to go with New construcion, he is going to have to remove some trim on the extior to get an accurate measuere anyway. At least that is how we do it.