Contributing to Retirement account

debo_2006

15 years ago

I have a small business and thus, contribute to a SEP IRA account. I'm a 50 YO female, and like most, lost approximately half of my earnings in my retirement account. Now that tax time is here, I have the option to contribute my maximum based on my 2008 earnings, but I'm hesitant to do so for fear of loosing that as well. Now, I'm aware the markets have been on an upswing the past few weeks. My accountant suggests contributing, but....

Is it wise to contribute now or ride it out and keep the money in my ING savings account? Thanks.

Comments (7)

joyfulguy
15 years ago
last modified: 9 years ago
Hi Deb,

Heck, you're young, yet, girl - I'm much older, and thankful to be enjoying good health.

Do you like to get products that you're buying on sale? Do you feel happy to get a product at not just an artificial "sale" reduction of 40%, but a real, verifiable 40% reduction?

Stocks are on sale, these days, many quality companies being available at 40% off earlier prices (which were, in a number of cases, overpriced).

They may be on fire sale, later - no one knows now whether that may happen, whether the market may drop substantially more before it moves on a mainly upward path again.

Maybe not.

Do you plan to retire within 3 or 4 years, maybe 5?

You're planning to be leaving that retirement account alone, to just sit there and grow, for several more years, aren't you?

I'm pretty sure that in about five years you'll be pleased with the results produced by a number of the equity investments that you make now.

With the huge debts that the U.S. is carrying ... plus the massive current deficits to finance the bottomless pit called "Iraq" ... and not only the bailouts to date ... but almost certainly more later ... the U.S. must depend on foreign financial suppliers.

Did you note the Chairman of China worrying to Hillary a week ago about whether the U.S. is managing their money well?

If the main banker of the U.S., the gov't. of China, doesn't want to lend more money without major inducements ... the U.S. will have to offer higher interest rates, so many are expecting inflation here. Especially since the U.S. is printing money at a great rate.

Do you figure to retire right soon, i.e., within three years or so ... maybe within five? If so, you may want to invest mainly in guaranteed-dollar assets - but even then, I'd say only related to money that you plan to need within the first few years of your retirement.

For money in there that you don't plan to withdraw for five years after retirement, or maybe up till 10, there's a good possibility that they'll grow better over those years in equities rather than in guaranteed-dollar assets.

Guaranteed dollars in the bank, bond, etc. apart from the rent that they produce on the money, not only don't grow ... in an inflationary environment, they lose value every year!

Plus - when interest rates rise ... the sale price of bonds issued earlier goes down.

I've been investing for almost 50 years, and worked as a personal financial advisor for 25 years recently - sold mutual funds initially for about a year, but didn't sell enough to suit my sponsoring broker, so didn't stay. Since then, offered advice only, sold no financial products: no conflict of interest.

Now, at 80, I have some of my assets in equity mutual funds, all bought prior to about 18 years ago: very few of the managers produce better growth rates than the parallel market averages, and they charge a fee for their management "expertise" every year. If they're as smart as they claim ... how come the stuff that they manage doesn't grow faster than the market averages?

I also have bought several individual stocks, periodically, as I had money available ... so that about 80% of my assets are in those equity-based situations.

I've lived in 22 locations, so have never owned a home, which many expect to increase in value, largely due to inflation.

I'm fortunate that, living frugally, I don't burn up all of my income from my three pensions, so don't need to draw on my equities.

They'd lost something about 30% of their value, at the bottom of the market, but that didn't trouble me substantially - not as much as I'd thought that it might.

In fact, I've been buying some more within the past two or three years ... and have seen them go down, as well ...

... but I expect that they'll recover, given time ... and now, they're paying a higher rate of dividend than earlier, when their prices were higher: Canadian banks are paying 5.5% - 8.5% dividend rates, these days ... and at very low tax rate (but interest attracts tax at top rate, outside of tax-deferred retirement accounts).

Some Canadian oil and gas, commercial, real estate, transportation, etc. companies that have agreed to pay out most of their profit in order to avoid tax have been paying 10 - 15 - 20% (with some risk of reduction, as earnings reduce). One rents out water heaters, so has fairly stable cash flow ... and pays 18%. They must all become regular corporations within a couple of years.

Good wishes for taking the long view - yes, you may die tomorrow ... but the possibilities are good that you'll live till 85, at least.

When we buy life insurance ... we bet that we're going to die (early) ... and the life insurance companies bet that we're going to live ... and they're the ones with the actuaries!

In this situation, you have the opportunity to choose an investment that will pay you while you're still alive ... and no longer working ... not wait till you're dead to pay!

ole joyful
debo_2006
Original Author
15 years ago
last modified: 9 years ago
Thanks ole joyful....I always enjoy your posts where ever I read them.

Yesterday, I finally decided to move forward and contribute the max to my SEP. Though my head was saying no, my heart was saying it's the right thing to do at 50 years old. So, with that, I'll contribute in low risk for now until things stablize. Then I can move things around.

We're all hoping thing rebound real soon, and stay steady or better, at that. I'm also somewhat of a frugal person, and seeing all that hard-earned money dissipate, is difficult for anyone to take....but I am not nearly alone, and many have lost a heck of a lot more, unfortunately.

Thanks for your post and the heads up via private email.
Related Discussions
Botched retirement account
Q
Comments (4)
It may not be a huge sum, but if was me, I'd pursue it. That interest, if it had been properly credited to your account would have compounded...etc. I'd start with the payroll service; they may try to discourage you, but I'd start there. Heck, they may be familiar with the procedure. If this happened to you, it could have happened to others as well. Of course I'd keep records of every phone call (date,time, name of person, etc)and would follow up every phone call with a letter (keeping a copy for yourself). Be prepared for some time, patience, and paperwork. Best of luck!
...See More
Mortgage Payoff With Retirement Funds
Q
Comments (13)
I agree with everyone so far - ramp up your savings, lower your spending, and do extra payments on the mortgage debt. Please don't take money out of your IRA to pay your mortgage off. At your tax rate, that's really robbing Peter to pay Paul. You have a good start on your investment account. Think of it as you've got half and your spouse has half. You mention your pension, what does your spouse have? We don't need to know, you just need to think about this. Half a million $$ on a 4% draw-down - which is generous, most advisors nowadays advise 3% - is $20K per spouse, before taxes. With tax hikes almost certain to come in the future, what are you estimating as your future tax rate? Have you looked into Roth conversions? Instead of throwing all your bonuses and extra funds into the mortgage, you might get a better return by splitting the money and using some of it to pay the taxes on the conversions each year before retirement. Also, your spouse needs to roll over those 401k's into one IRA. Trust me, if anything happens to her, it's a paperwork headache for the survivor to get that done. It takes time and energy, and when somebody's grieving, it's the last thing one wants to do. But it's a necessity if you don't want the IRS to get involved. I'm going to offer some questions for you to think about because you are at the perfect point to start doing serious retirement planning. The reason you need to figure out if your assumptions are correct for future savings and the best return on spending, is that if those assumptions are wrong or plain bad luck intervenes, you still have time to adjust and make corrections. Have you and your wife sat down to talk specifically about what both of you envision retirement to be? What's your 'bucket list'? What's hers? What do you want to do in retirement? How much will it cost to do those things? For example: I retired 2 yrs before DH did. Our expenses did NOT go down and our income stayed static because we were contributing as much as we could to DH's 401k. But when he did retire, our expenses jumped overall. We have retirement health benefits, so there was no extra cost there. But we wanted to travel locally, and even that required several hundred $$ of clothing and travel accessories. We were able to donate an entire carload of work clothes to charity, which was great for deserving poor folks, but no one was going to pay us for them. That first year we spent almost four months out of twelve traveling through Northern CA and the PNW, mostly car trips but a few airline trips, at a cost of almost $25K post-tax. We do what I consider to be mid-level travel: not budget or RV travel, but not luxury high-end places either. If I were in your situation I would find a certified or registered financial advisor to run some numbers. What will happen if one of you dies? What happens if one of you gets disabled and needs care? What happens to the surviving spouse if death or disability happens BEFORE retirement? Are you adequately insured to mitigate the bigger risks in your life (and it takes some analysis to figure out what those risks are, that might prevent you from achieving your goals)? Do you have enough $$ coming in for a sufficient 'cushion', especially if you intend to maintain two houses in retirement? Do you know what medical insurance will cost for a pre-Medicare senior? What if a serious medical condition happens and one spouse becomes uninsurable, or at least rateable? Can the budget afford the insurance and any needed medications or extra co-pays? How do you plan to handle long term care costs for one of you? For both of you? These kinds of questions are just as important, perhaps even more so, than the simple question of "should I pay off my mortgage with IRA money." HTH, and good luck going forward.
...See More
How to account for potential future inheritance for retirement?
Q
Comments (17)
ian_bc_north Transferring principle assets is never a good idea as far as estate planning. You loose the stepped up value that happens with inheritance. Not to mention other legal issues that could come up. My ex mother in law gave my grandson 40 acres here in Ca. and insisted on doing it before she passed away, transferred it to his name, so now he has her base. If she would have willed it to him he would have gotten a stepped up value and would pay much less in capitol gains if he decides to sell it. And you must keep in the guidelines of the gift tax. Gift tax can come back to bite you if you give to much in any given year or over the life limits. My father is trying to reduce the amount of tax he is paying on interest income. He can give $12,000.00 a year to any one he wishes but go over that amount to any one person and the IRS want's to know about it. I am not totally clear on it but that's what the CPA told us. My father wanted to sell a small commercial property and give the money to us kids and was told it would effect his estate taxes if he gave each of us that kind of money all at once. My understanding is he can give me up to a million in his lifetime but if he dose it will be added back in the calculation for his total estate and would be taxed accordingly after his death. His plan is for us to pay as little as legally possible in estate taxes on the money he leaves us. The first $12,000.00 in any given year for any one person is exempt. As far as nasty fights over inheritance my father is not a fool and contrary to popular belief knows his children well. This is why he give me a detailed accounting each month. He has told me on several occasions he dose this to protect me later. Meaning he doesn't want me to have any hassles so everything is written in stone, in his handwriting, and his attorney is kept in the loop. I realize that in most families these thing are usually not talked about so openly or in my case so often. In some ways I am grateful I am so well informed and protected but sometimes it hits me like a tone of bricks. I don't think my father realizes the emotional toll it takes on me always talking about what will happen when he dies. It's been 3 years this month since my mother passed away and I really don't want to go there again. I hope he lives for another 100 years and takes all the money with him. That would be the best gift he could give me.
...See More
Retirement Account contributing
Q
Comments (9)
Do you expect to retire right soon (within 5 - 7 years) ... and have a fairly small amount of dollar-denominated assets in your tax-deferred retirement account? Do you expect to probably die before age 60 - 65 - 70? That is - do you have a short-term time horizon for your retirement system to complete its business for you? I figure that I should figure on financing my retirement till age 100 or so: prefer to run out of days before I run out of money rather than the other way around! Does the idea of having the current value of your assets fluctuate somewhat set you to chewing fingernails/not sleeping well nights/being too crabby to live with? Do you like to get a genuine bargain, e.g. a real discount of, say, 40%? Stocks are on sale, lower price relatively now than for many years. They may be on fire sale later, who knows which way the market will go over the short term? But over the long term, stocks have done about the best of any investment vehicle ... and you have, what ... a 30 year time horizon? 40 years? Even up to 50? But I`ve been buying, periodically, and expect to continue to do so ... getting to the airport to see my flight pulling on to the tarmac (or taking off) isn't my idea of a good way to travel. See my fuller suggestions over on the "Retirement" forum. Good wishes for making current choices that'll please you in 10 years, that you'll be happy with, then. ole joyful P.S. Memo to Canadians ... most financial advisors say that *everyone* should have RRSPs. I say that they may be useful in some situations ... but were I able to buy them now (at 80, I've not been able to for over 10 years: I'm required to remove certain minimum amounts annually now, with the percentage rising annually till 20% at age 90 and beyond), I'd be following a different path for all but dollar-denominated (i.e. guaranteed dollar) assets. On my death, they get all added into income in that year ... and taxed at top rate: no, thanks! There are some substantial tax reductions and deferrals available when buying equities with after-tax money that one loses entirely if one puts them into an RRSP. In low tax brackets back then ... I saved about 26% tax going in ... with higher income now, am paying about 37% now as I take the money out. Again ... no, thanks! But I don't have an option! Well, yes, I do - but I'm not sure that I want to follow it, big time. o j
...See More
stargazzer
15 years ago
last modified: 9 years ago
I mean no offense, but I don't understand this kind of thinking. Your lost half your retirement and are thinking about putting more money where you lost the other. I would put it in the bank, why take a chance of losing more.
dreamgarden
15 years ago
last modified: 9 years ago
"Now, I'm aware the markets have been on an upswing the past few weeks. My accountant suggests contributing, but....

Is it wise to contribute now or ride it out and keep the money in my ING savings account? Thanks. "

Stargazzer makes a very good point. These are not normal times. I would hesitate to invest more until the regulators are reined in and start doing what they supposed to.

A link that might be useful:

Economist: US collapse driven by 'fraud'; Geithner covering up bank insolvency
Stephen C. Webster
April 4, 2009

rawstory.com/news/2008/Economist_US_collapse_
driven_by_fraud_0404.html
arielitas_mom
15 years ago
last modified: 9 years ago
I think ol' joyful is right in encouraging you to put money into equities - you're not retiring soon, and the money will likely grow over the long term.

There are 2 issues here - one is whether to fund your IRA and what to do with the investment. The answer to the first question is a big YES - if you've got the money to do so...it will lower your tax basis (I believe that a SEP IRA is like a 401K/403B in that you're putting pre-tax dollars into a SEP and paying tax on the your gross income minus the contribution.) In either event - even without that tax advantage, the interest and growth you will have is tqax free or tax deferred.

The second issue is whether to buy equities or put the money in fixed income vehicles (money market, treasuries, etc.) which you surely can do within the SEP IRA investment choices
retirement_planner
14 years ago
last modified: 9 years ago
The 401k account is also one of the prime retirement accounts in the United States. By having the account, one can save funds for retirement.

Here you can learn about 401 k Plan

Here is a link that might be useful: Retirement Panning
joyfulguy
14 years ago
last modified: 9 years ago
Heck ... I've been retired for over 10 years now ... and I'm not about to "pan" retirement! I think that it's great, especially when one's in good health!

(Actually, I think that the previous poster meant "retirement planning" in her/his link ... and I'm just teasing a bit).

When you're retired ... every day is holiday!

If you plan to live for more than 10 years ... better carry some of your assets in equities.

By the way ... she didn't actually lose money when the markets went down ... unless she sold!

When the markets have gone down heavily ... that may well be a time to buy, rather than sell!

There's a good possibility that the markets will recover most of their former "value", given time. They were overpriced before.

They're largely underpriced now (or were so, a few months ago, prior to recent partial recovery).

Many of you guys'd have a heck of a time being a farmer ... you'd be afraid to buy a cow ... for fear that she'd die on you!

Why should the banks make more on the money that you lend them than you do on that money?

Learn to manage it effectively yourself!

I hope that you're enjoying spring ... I should be home, planting garden.

ole joyful

P.S. Question: What's better than putting your money into a bank?

Answer: Buying (a chunk of) (a well-managed, e.g. Canadian ... and many U.S., usually smaller, that haven't got too big for their britches) a bank!

o j

Contributing to Retirement account

Comments (7)

joyfulguy

debo_2006
Original Author

Related Discussions

stargazzer

dreamgarden

arielitas_mom

retirement_planner

joyfulguy

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

Contributing to Retirement account

Comments (7)

joyfulguy

debo_2006Original Author

Related Discussions

stargazzer

dreamgarden

arielitas_mom

retirement_planner

joyfulguy

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

debo_2006
Original Author