|
| We found a wonderful home earlier this week that we are very interested in. We have been discussing putting an offer on it. It is a resale home only 3 years old, we expected to see very little of note in the disclosure since it is so new. But we saw something that makes us nervous. Because we do not know anything about these types of issues it might be something or it might be nothing.
Under "has the roof been replaced or repaired" there is a "yes" and under "has the roof leaked under your ownership" there is a "yes". And the description for these yes answers is that the heating system flashing was repaired. Of course we will be having an inspection done on the house. But would something like this indicate there will be considerable roof issues with this house throughout our ownership? Is it typically a "deal breaker" type issue? Or is it easily repaired and likely the repair the owner did will be the last we hear of this? Thanks in advance for your thoughts! |
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| It's not surprising, even with a newer home, that a repair to the flashing was needed. It does not necessarily indicate serious roof issues now or in the future. In our first house we had a similar issue in the first year. The garage roof was leaking because a couple of shingles came loose during high winds. It was a new house. Repair was completed and there were no further problems during our time there. Flashing, in my opinion, is not a deal breaker issue. It's normal to need to maintain flashing periodically and a relatively easy fix. The hardest part is probably getting on the roof. This is kind of soon for a repair to be made and leads me to think it was a construction error. The bigger problem would be if other construction mistakes were made throughout the house. In other words, was this a minor mistake or is it indicative of the overall building quality? An inspector can best answer your questions. |
|
| If you have the roof checked out by a Roofer, do not use one recommended by your realtor. Your inspector should also not come through your realtor! Try to avoid any conflict of interest. |
|
| Do NOT have a plain inspector look at the roof. Most of them could not recognize deficient work if it hit them in the face. Pay a roofer. Preferably an old fart roofer that has been doing it for a long time. The life expectancy of many of the 'new' methods has yet to be verified. Their sole purpose is to reduce cost, and quality and life be damned. |
|
| I agree that leaky flashing is a relatively common roof issue in both new, newer and older homes. These never surprise me. What I don't understand is why you should not use a roof or home inspector recommended by your Realtor as a blanket policy that chispa stated. |
|
- Posted by JadedBaroness (My Page) on Tue, Nov 27, 12 at 12:03
| Thanks for those thoughts. I have started to research inspectors and found two on my own, one recommended by my realtor and one used by a friend. So I have 4 to speak with when the time comes to choose one. And we are considering bringing a roofer specifically as well based on the recommendations here. We put an offer in yesterday so I want to be prepared if we are able to reach an agreement. |
|
| Have a professional roofer look at that part ofthe house. And in a small town you will want to bring in someone from a different small town or the nearest larger city. Small town inspectors depend on the same small pool of realtors and sellers for their livelihood. Ask me how I know this....get an inspector who will be objective. Their liability is limited to their fee for the service, so they don't have much skin in the game. You need somebody who doesn't go to church with the realtor or seller. |
|
| "What I don't understand is why you should not use a roof or home inspector recommended by your Realtor as a blanket policy that chispa stated. " It is not as likely to be an unbiased opinion. How many RE folks would continue to recommend a 'deal killer'? you really want an uninterested, uninvolved, does NOT stand to benefit either way, person. Someone more likely to be objective. |
|
| "How many RE folks would continue to recommend a 'deal killer'?" I'm not sure WHO a "deal killer" is, but it's not a person. The inspector writes what he sees and it's up to the buyer whether or not if a newly discovered problem is a "deal killer". A professional inspector, the type that I would recommend, simply calls it as he sees it. I would absolutely expect him to reveal a major problem if one surfaces - that's what he's paid to do. And they all require payment up front because they don't want people to refuse payment later because they don't like what they read in the report - does that sound biased or intending to benefit either party? |
|
- Posted by dreamgarden (My Page) on Wed, Nov 28, 12 at 14:35
| "Do NOT have a plain inspector look at the roof." LOL. Our home inspector refused to go up on the roof. Probably because there was a foot of snow on the ground and he didn't bring a ladder. How does one go about having a roof inspected in bad weather?
|
|
| "I'm not sure WHO a "deal killer" is, but it's not a person." A person who points out insignificant defects and beats down every place would be a 'deal killer.' There ase plenty of them out there. raining for 'home inspector' is all over the place from state to state. Some places license, others do not. Anyone who wants to be a 'home inspector' can hang out a sign and start 'inspecting.' There are even mail order courses. Many point out electrical ad plumbing issues' that are completely code compliant, since the applicable code in almost every case is what was in effect when the structure was built. NOT the latest revision for things built now.
|
|
| Seems to me like many generic housing inspectors do not inspect the roof, other than what is visible from the ground. Read your contract carefully. Also, inspectors get business from realtors. It's a fact of business life. Some inspectors will minimize issues to get along with the realtor in the interest of future business, and some will not. Get referrals. Take your own pictures. I always thought I should get two basic inspections, with $100 bonus to the most detailed. But it turns out I needed so many special inspections - chimney, oil, septic, well, lead, radon, asbestos, mold, all of which seem to be extra now. Good luck. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Buying and Selling Homes Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.