|
| A few years ago we purchased a property using an agent from Madison, Wisconsin. The Agency Agreement that we signed included language regarding a Success Fee, stating that the fee was due even if the deal failed to close. Our deal did close, so we didn't have to deal with paying a commission on a dead deal....but is this type of language common? |
Follow-Up Postings:
|
- Posted by ncrealestateguy (My Page) on Wed, Aug 24, 11 at 13:01
| I have not heard of that. Why would you have agreed to that? Are you sure that it did not mean that if the agent found a willing, ready and able buyer at an agreed upon price, then you would owe a commission if you defaulted under the terms of the contract? I have heard of this arrangement. |
|
- Posted by folkvictorian (My Page) on Sun, Aug 28, 11 at 15:07
| Thank you for the answer, NCR. To clarify, here's the language: "If this Agreement calls for a success fee, it is agreed that Broker has earned the success fee if, during the term of this Agreement, Buyer or any person acting on behalf of Buyer acquires an interest in property or enters into an enforceable written contract between owner and Buyer to acquire an interest in property, at any terms and price acceptable to owner and Buyer. Broker's compensation remains due and payable if an enforceable written contract entered into by Buyer fails to close. Once earned, Broker's compensation is due and payable at the earlier of closing or the date set for closing, unless otherwise stated in writing." To me, it sounds like we would have owed the $$ no matter who broke the contract, once it was entered into. Am I reading it incorrectly? Since I've only received one answer to my question, I'm guessing this isn't common. The real estate deal we closed was for a very small amount.
|
|
| Looks like a 'buyers agent' agreement that is trying to collect from the buyer if they screw up. Since they do not have a contract with the seller they cannot collect from them if the deal falls apart. |
|
| " between owner and Buyer to acquire an interest in property," One could argue that the transfer of interest in a property happens when ownership changes hands at closing. |
|
- Posted by folkvictorian (My Page) on Wed, Aug 31, 11 at 15:32
| OK, it's loud and clear that this clause isn't the norm and if we ever see anything like it again, we should avoid it! Thank you one and all. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Buying and Selling Homes Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.