|
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| I would have still sweated in copper for that filter. The need to use all those 90 degree fittings makes this NOT a good spot for PEX. Use the PEX when its flexibility is a benefit. Keep in mind also you do not have to remove the old galvanized lines. You might blow them out just to avoid any trapped water draining out at an undesired time and location. |
|
- Posted by seattleCraftsman (My Page) on Wed, Mar 23, 11 at 23:51
| An advantage of the PEX into the filter and into the manifold was also price - 10' of 1" PEX was about a third the cost of copper. But agree - a pain in that corner. Galvanized lines that'll be orphaned with bath remodel run up outside wall - intended to leave them in. Good idea to shoot some air through to help dry them. |
|
| What is the actual lumen of those 90 degree fittings? There sharpness is also going to cause some pressure drop when the water is flowing. They look a lot sharper than a wrought copper bend (especially a long bend). |
|
- Posted by seattleCraftsman (My Page) on Thu, Mar 24, 11 at 23:46
| You're giving me a complex about the elbows in the corner. Thinking I could replace the run into the filter with a bend. The issue then are the three before the manifold...Can't say I'm all that pleased with how that section of PEX turned out. Tankless will go on wall to the right of the manifold, so maybe run out of filter, bend up and into top cold of manifold with two more bends. Then I'd run out bottom cold of manifold to tankless. That said, these are the only elbows in the system, and certainly fine on pressure. In studying up on PEX, found sources like the one linked that talks about "PEX tubing has a smaller inside diameter than copper tubing, at a given source pressure, both tubing systems meet the farthest fixture demand." That study had a couple PEX 90s combined with bends. Definitely the 1" PEX 90s look pretty wimpy next to a copper 90. |
Here is a link that might be useful: Fixture Flow Rate Comparison: Copper/PEX
|
| The study is so bad they did not even use the same fixtures in both cases. Just plain sloppy. If they used that many 90s in the PEX setup they are crazy. One of the advantages of PEX is that when space is available for bends they can be made without any fittings. A general test like they have done just shows that the two technologies when configured similarly can flow about the same water. It says nothing about any particular system, and without flow curves you cannot determine if a particular system is going to be adequate. While few DIYers seem to ever use anything but type M copper (hard drawn and not bendable) type L can be a great tool (especially in old work) since it CAN be bent and formed. It takes some practice (even with the correct bending tools) to not collapse the pipe, but it can save fittings in many cases. |
|
- Posted by seattleCraftsman (My Page) on Fri, Mar 25, 11 at 18:34
| Little more digging, copper and PEX fitting loss expressed in equivalent length of pipe. So the 1" PEX 90s add a bit more than double the length of pipe vs. copper 90s. That sound right? Sounds like at some point I should take the 10 minutes to change these 90s out for bends. |
|
- Posted by oldhousegal (My Page) on Thu, Apr 7, 11 at 1:06
| Late to this thread, but 6 years and counting on my PEX retrofit of my 1919 Craftsman (professionally installed). I love this stuff. It doesn't freeze, the water tastes great, and no more wasting water, waiting for the rusty stuff to clear. It was half the price of copper, and guaranteed for 20 years, whereas my plumber only guarantees copper for 5 years. I did have one problem and from what I was told, PEX likes to go back to it's original shape. The plumber put a loop under the water supply to my clawfoot tub, and I came home one day from work to find my oak floors in the dining room flooded. Luckily most of the water was flowing down to the unfinished basement below, and the hardwoods were fairly easy to clean up and dry. I discovered the PEX had tried to go back to it's shape, pulling the supply line just off enough to cause the leak. I fixed it by adding blocks near the PEX and securing with u-clamps to keep the shape the plumber intended, which in turn stopped the leak. I'm not sure if this is a common problem or not, but even with that problem, I love my pipes! |
|
| Late to join, but I'll mention something about leaving in the abandoned galvanized. When I redid my galv with copper, nearly 30 years ago, I left the galv on the basement floor for a while. After/as it dried out it exuded a really foul odor. Once I realized what was happening, I got it outside pronto. Your deposits may vary. Also regarding the galvanized. I've found that it cuts really well with a cut-off blade in an angle grinder. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Plumbing Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.




