Return to the Pets Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
We pet owners are worse for the environment than SUV drivers

Posted by handymac (My Page) on
Tue, Dec 22, 09 at 10:14

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091220/sc_afp/lifestyleclimatewarminganimalsfood

Shame on us.

Now, the authors of that ridiculous article can kiss my rosy red-----er-----nose.

It is unbelieveable to what inane lengths some people will stoop to have their 15 minutes of attention.


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: We pet owners are worse for the environment than SUV drivers

This probably belongs on Animal Debates, but I agree with you that it's a ridiculous article.

All animals leave a "carbon footprint," including humans, don't we? Plants and animals are all rightful parts of the world.

We may be able to slow down global warming a bit in other ways, but pets to share our lives with are not expendable, in my opinion.


 o
RE: We pet owners are worse for the environment than SUV drivers

Those types of people would be happy if the whole human race just up and died and left the earth alone. Crackpots.


 o
RE: We pet owners are worse for the environment than SUV drivers

I say that if they lived in Afghanistan, they would be Taliban...that mind-set is not restricted to one place or people, there are always people who have an agenda and they feel they are right.
I don't get exited about it, it's just their skewed opinion.


 o
RE: We pet owners are worse for the environment than SUV drivers

What an idiotic article, the impact of pets is minimal compared to industrial and other pollution caused by humans. I guess washing toxic chemicals into waterways and the ocean is fine, as long as it's done by people, but perish the though of dogs peeing outdoors. Stupid!!


 o
RE: We pet owners are worse for the environment than SUV drivers

The researchers were simply stating facts. Very clinical but it doesn't cover the whole picture. The SUV owner probably has a couple of over indulged children, lives in too big a house, and buys every toy in sight. If we want to decrease carbon footprints, how about fewer children? I'd rather have a cat and a dog in every home than a child if you look at it from the carbon foot print standard.


 o
RE: We pet owners are worse for the environment than SUV drivers

The conceptions about SUV owners crack me up. I have one child who is not over-indulged (absolutely by his standards, pretty much by my standards and even by a crabby great-aunt's standards), do live in too big a house (but it's over 100 years old - recycling at its best), don't even own a DVD player and need the SUV to transport the dogs and navigate the driveway.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Pets Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here