|
| DW and I are in the process of renovating a 2-family house in Cambridge MA (hence an area with both plunging cold temps and wind, and with plenty of heat and humidity also). The house is a 100-year-old house with a lathe-and-plaster wall construction and no insulation in the walls.
We are talking with an insulation guy about having Icynene reformulated in a slow-grow mix blown into the walls of the house. Someone raised the concern that Icynene blown into the walls can cause problems with buckling of the lathe-and-plaster or oozing out of holes like electrical receptacles. Does anyone have experience blowing Icynene into an old house without taking the walls down, and would they care to share their experiences? |
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| No experience with it (yet :-), but one thing to be aware of blowing insulation into old houses is that they tend to have more internal braces and blocking than modern houses. Each of the corners of our 1940's house has nice diagonal braces between the studs. So the placement of the holes needs to be done carefully, not just mid-level and high level, for example, but figure out where any internal blocks are, or you'll end up with large gaps in your insulation. |
|
- Posted by pipersville_carol (My Page) on Sat, Feb 17, 07 at 20:53
| I got an estimate for Icynene in our former house, an 1867 Victorian. It seemed like an excellent product, especially for an old house. It was my first choice but we couldn't afford it. Went with blown-in cellulose instead. |
|
| Reviving this old thread... We are currently renovating, and I've gotten varying advice on insulating my 1896 four square/colonial revival with horse hair plaster and zero insulation is: - Blown in cellulose or icynene in the walls My concern that this along with air sealing will make my house too tight, primarily the attic. Worried about moisture, rot, sick house syndrome, radon, etc. I've been told by HVAC and other folks that I can't make this old house too tight. Anyone have experience with either or both products in their old house? Any other thoughts or suggestions would be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance! |
|
| Here are some general observations, four years (almost to the day!) after going with icynene in our c.1908 house. Down-sides: Now the plus sides: As a whole, we don't regret at all getting icynene insulation, and would do it again in a heartbeat. But those caveats do need to be kept in mind, and you shouldn't go with it if the cost or the wall issues are a problem. |
|
| Dr JimBob: Thanks so much for the update!! I'm reassured you had a good experience with icynene (esp since I also live in Boston metro). I'm not thrilled with the cost either and it's good to know about the plaster issue. I'm waiting to meet with the insulation company next week and will report back. |
|
| Make sure they will have access to an infrared camera to check for voids that did not get filled. |
|
- Posted by xoldtimecarpenter (My Page) on Tue, Feb 22, 11 at 1:21
| Once your house walls are insulated to R-13 you have just about maxed out your heat conduction resistance. Going to R-40, for example, gives you just 5% more conductive resistance. Now the major problem is going to be heat traveling on air flow. Blocking this is a weather-sealing, not an insulation problem. Foams are good at weather-sealing. So is cellulose. Foams are about 4-5 times more costly than cellulose, but not 4-5 times more effective. So if cost is not a factor, absolutely go with foams. If cost is a factor, dense-pack cellulose delivers more value for the buck. Low expanding closed cell foams are a little dangerous to loose plaster, but seldom to properly adhering plaster. This risk is often exaggerated -- but if you want to find out where your plaster is loose, this is a good way to do it. I would generally recommend cellulose, then spend some of the savings on weather-sealing around the windows, doors and house sills and pile up some more insulation in the attic. The overall improvement will be greater than if you just insulated with even the best foam without weather-sealing. Keep in mind that either product is absolutely dependent on proper insulation -- so know your contractor and absolutely take infrared photos to verify full coverage with no gaps. Best of luck with the project. |
|
- Posted by ncremodeler (My Page) on Tue, Feb 22, 11 at 21:55
| HulaGalj, Get lots of info on UNICO. I tried that in a large older home and it was disaster! Hard to discern bad install/equipment or both. It stays broken and does not heat and cool properly when it runs. I have a 3 and 5 ton unit. The 5 was replaced 2 years ago and needs replacing again. I would not use Unico. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Old House Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.