I suppose we could rip out all of the backsplash and start over again. But, since the white subway tile is appropriate to the period look of our kitchen which has a mix of original-type cabinets and custom made replicas, I'd most likely end up just putting in white subway tile again. So this seems kind of silly (and expensive and a hassle).

Thoughts anyone? Is this going to look goofy with that extra line of soapstone? Thanks.

The counters are not soapstone, but epoxy resin from old lab tables. I had a scrap of material that was about the right length, and with a height of 3 1/4". Since I wanted the appearance of a vintage kitchen sink, I used the scrap, then used marble tiles around it. If you look at the right side of the pic, you'll see that the marble surrounds the resin scrap, because the scrap was a little short. This is just behind the sink--I have beadboard elsewhere in the kitchen.

I've read that the short 4" backsplash of counter material is dated, but I like the way that this piece looks in my kitchen. Also, I thought that lower on the wall, the resin would be easier to keep clean than the honed marble.

Wider shot without dishes draining on counter:

I hope the photos help you make a decision. There are so many kitchens with the short backsplash, I don't think yours will look goofy. (But if folks say that it does, point them to my kitchen, and they can have a really good laugh.) ;)

mama--Thanks for the photo. It looks as though the only place you had to do this was behind the sink. Am I right? t looks fine to me, but I would need to do it pretty much everywhere vs. just behind the sink as you have. And, one more quick question for you. Is that marble I see on your other countertop? If so, how do you like it? And, how do you like it with the soapstone?

sailorgirl--Good thought, and that is something I hadn't thought about. This "little" project is turning into a much bigger headache than I 'd ever anticipated!

They always do!

There was laminate counters with the 4" laminate backplash. Above that was a ceramic tile backsplash.
They wanted to change the counter but not the backsplash. When the fabricater came out it was determined that the old cabinets/counter was not level. For the granite to be level the "4 in" granite backsplash would have to be customized to fit. I think it starts at about 3" and runs up to 4". They were very concerned that it would look funny but it doesn't. You would never know unless you measured. The fabricator cut it on site (in the yard). It sounds just like your kitchen.

I would be more concerned with cutting the tile out. Would you do that yourself or have someone else do it? I think its doable with good planning and patience.

The kitchen is central in an open floor plan. To keep the look clean and unfussy we decided to just have painted walls under the cabinets. I'm happy with the look and it's served us well for 5 yrs. But I also think it would look good with simple tiles above the backsplash.

You can see it from different vantages - the clearest is in the shot of the sink - in "amck's " kitchen in the Finished Kitchens Blog.

In my kitchen, the short backsplash is in only the sink area--I didn't have enough of the resin slabs to go around the whole kitchen, even if I'd wanted to. The counters around the sink and stove are epoxy resin, cut from old lab table tops. No soapstone--the other counter is made from New St.Laurent marble tiles, as is the sink backsplash. I love the marble.

I did find this interesting blog with photos of someone who'd installed the short backsplash. Her fabricator recommended the short soapstone backsplash saying that if there is a seam area where the soapstone counter would meet the white wall tile at countertop level it would be a seam that would appear to be dirtier and gunkier than a seam at that level between soapstone and soapstone. I have to say that is true of my current set up where the tile counter top meets the white backsplash tile. So, maybe that is another good reason to do this that I hadn't thought of.

http://firstian-kitchen.blogspot.com/2012/04/countertop.html#!/2012/04 /countertop.html

One suggestion of late is to do a lower backsplash, say 2". This avoids the more common look of the 4" bs. I believe a GW kitchen member has done this of late.

Love soapstone. Good luck.

BTW the insurance paid for a new backsplash since the granite couldn't be installed exactly where it was before and I got $1100.00 for a $300 backsplash :)

mountaineergirl--Very interesting insight from you for a pretty much similar situation where you have actually been able to see what is going on as the process proceeds. I installed this backsplash myself and could do another one pretty easily if I had to. $300 is my kind of price too!

The more I think about it, I am suspecting that we should just go ahead now and try to see how difficult it will be to remove that bottom row of tiles without damaging the next one up. That might just force us into a decison right away.

Thanks again.