Return to the Heating & Air Conditioning Forum
| Post a Follow-Up
new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional AC
| | |
Posted by lsugymrat24 (My Page) on Sat, Nov 14, 09 at 23:17
| we plan to build a home next year in south Louisiana. our builder suggests a closed-loop geothermal WaterFurnace unit, because of the 30% tax refund from Uncle Sam as well as higher energy efficiency over other system types.
We are not familiar with geothermal as most people in our area have conventional AC systems. We are concerned about possible future costs and problems associated with having part of the system buried in ground. The geothermal system also seems to be a much more complicated/elaborate system than conventional units.
we have not yet performed a J-calc on the house to compare size of unit needed, cost of purchase and install, monthly operation costs, maintenance, and future replacement for different system types. But we do know the following specs for the house... 2500 SF living. R-23 in walls (rockwool spray and alum backed styrofoam). R-50+ spray in attic. Top plates and sole plates will be calked. alum radiant barrier backed OSB on roof to keep attic cool. super efficient vinyl windows and fiber doors.
gets into the upper 90s/low 100s during summer and down into 30s/40s during winter.
all of this taken into consideration, what do you recommend?
1. closed-loop WaterFurnace geothermal heat pump
2. air source heat pump
3. 16+ SEER conventional AC/furnace |
Follow-Up Postings:
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
| I am by no means a pro but just recently did the HP/geo decision. It looks like you are already planning a high efficiency home to start with which is great because every dollar spent to seal and insulate will come back if you live in the home for more than 5 years. If you go geothermal the pipe used in the loops has usually has a 50yr warranty but probably only on the pipe itself not reinstall/repair..something to check on. If you plan to live in the home for 20 or more years I would seriously consider geothermal. You have more of a cooling climate than heating which a heat pump even with heat strips would really work out great efficiency wise down there, but I am curious about the salinity of the air. How far south and how corrosive is the air is one other thing to consider. If you have to worry about the outside unit being in a corrosive environment I would really think geothermal. There are so many things to consider and different ways to look at it. The outlook for electricity is increasingly higher rates to help cover the cost to make the coal plants cleaner and for more 'green' energy. The higher the electricity cost goes the better the geothermal will look. If I was doing a new build and able to spin the cost of geothermal into the home without stretching other things I would head that way, even on a very energy efficient home. I would compare the cost differential between 15+ seer HP and geothermal very closely and then look at the past 10 years of your electrical rates and past 5 years and do some projections for what the next 5-10 could be. Either choice if installed properly will not be a losing proposition which is the best news! I went back with a higher efficiency HP and let the geothermal go. I do not know if I will be in this home in 10 years and didn't see payback in 10 unless rates skyrocket which will probably be my luck. I will over time invest in making this 3yr old home of swiss cheese more into a sealed up efficient unit and will see more savings than putting in geothermal and letting my conditioned air run out of like a door is open. |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
air source heat pump. the only geothermal hvac company I know of is out of baton rouge and hires out locally for install of loops. cost is very high here in La for geo thermal. (although it is more reasonable in other areas) you can get a high seer heat pump that will qualify for the federal tax rebate also. also you should check the dept of natural resources program for new construction. get incentive dollars from them for building efficiently. also BR has a LAHouse @ LSU. this house incoprerates geothermal, gas and hp and is a teaching homeowners to build better and more efficiently. best of luck |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
| What type of quotes are you getting for the complete geo-thermal system? Geo-thermal can sometimes be more resonably priced on new construction than on retrofits. I choose an air-source heatpump since I was retrofitting into an existing home and geo-thermal would have been too difficult and expensive. If geo-thermal only cost's say 10K dollars more I would go with geo-thermal in a heartbeat expecially if you plan on being in the house a while. |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
| When we built (in Northern VA), I did a cost benefit trade between Geothermal HVAC with a blown cellulose insulation package and a HE Forced Air System with propane for heat and electric for AC with a foam insulation package. Both options were about the same cost to install but at the time propane was almost 4 bucks a gallon and climbing so I went with the GT system. The relatively small extra cost of GT heat pumps compared to forced air heat pumps isn't enough to make or break that selection. However, the cost for the loop field (horizontal pit or wells) can be significantant as well as problematic - so there is risk in whatever cost estimate you get for the loop field. Finding qualified, experienced installers and maintainance people is very hard in some areas and that factor alone should weigh heavily in your decision. My HVAC contractor is 15 minutes from my home and had been doing GT for over 25 years. BUT there is only one other company in the area that I would trust to work on my system. If these guys go out of business, I will have to become my own HVAC service technician. There are many factors that go into properly designing a GT systems and it is too impotrant of a function and much money to be risking especially when there may be better options suited for your geogrpahic location. If I lived in a high moisture/hot area like LA or FL, I would opt for the forced air approach and spend extra on spray foam insulation, good quality windows and doors, and proper ventilation (see Energy Recovery Vents). I love my GT system and have had great results. But it isn't a slam dunk solution for everyone even with the tax credits. |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
It does depend how developed your area is in regards to geothermal. In my area (SE Pa) there are contractors and suppliers that have been doing geo for many years. So the practical knowledge is there. We also have several well drilling companies that do a good job and compete for business. You have to talk to different companies to determine if you feel relatively comfortable with their experience. The tax credit for geo is a big deal. You get 30% back on the entire hvac system. So if the geo price is $50k you get $15k back. If the convential system is $30k you get 0 back. So for new construction it is often an easy decision to go with geo. |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
| Hey guys, thanks for all the posts. To answer some of your questions... 1. countryboymo, we are not close enough to the Gulf of Mexico to worry about sality caused corrosion of outdoor equipment... though the air is usually very humid which may contribute to rust and whatnot 2. countryboymo, we do plan to live in this home for the next 50 years or more 3. Geothermal installs get a 30% rebate for the equipment and labor with no $$$ limit. All other installs receive a tax credit for 30% of the cost, up to $1,500 max per year. Many of the products in our home will qualify for the latter of these two programs -- fireplace, doors, windows, etc -- so if we don't go with geothermal then we basically get no tax incentives on our AC. http://www.energy.gov/taxbreaks.htm 4. energy_rater_la, can you direct me to a link for the dept of natural resources program for new construction to get incentive dollars from them for efficient building? or do you have more info on the topic? 5. energy_rater_la, my builder took part in the construction of LA House on the LSU campus. I agree in that it is very informative place to visit. 6. We just finished the 4th preliminary phase of our house plans, and our builder's AC guy now has a copy of them. Hopefully he will do a j-load calc and provide us with some options for geo, air source pump, and conventional systems relatively soon. When I get the quotes, I will post them here. 7. we actually have a well on the property, but I hear that open loop geo systems are not a good idea. the minerals in well water supposedly cause buildup in the pipes and corrosion in the equipment. supposedly closed loop systems are the better alternative if they are installed properly but that brings about concerns with higher install prices and with having an experieced installer for the UG piping. we are also concerned with having part of the system burried in the ground (possibly having to dig up the yard due to complications is a little scary). Hopefully I will have more info for you guys soon. in the meantime, keep the posts and info coming. THANKS!!! |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
| The one thing you didn't mention was what type of heating system you would use with the conventional AC. NG? Propane? That info makes a bit of difference. |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
| Thanks weedmeister. We would use NG since we will already be using it for our clothes dryer, high efficiency fireplace, outdoor cooking area, etc. I do have another question for you guys. If we decide to go with geothermal, a byproduct is hot water. what type of water heater would you use in combination with the geothermal unit? |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
| You have to do a cost benefit analysis for your unique set of circumstances. We are building now. Geothermal was not cost effective even with the tax credit. When the tax credit was announced, some geothermal installers and manufacturers raised their prices, negating much of the savings. BTW, the other tax benefits you mentioned are applicable only to upgrading existing homes, not to new construction. |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
| Hey guys finally got the HVAC plans to our builders AC guy. They ran a j-calc and did cost comparisons for the units we specified. The calc shows that we need 3.88 tons including ventilation air. first, we looked at conventional units. Between 14 and 16 seer, there is a $2200 difference in equipment cost. 14 SEER = $10893 & 16 SEER = $13,100 b/c they buy so many 15 seer trane systems, they get the 15 seer system at the same price as a 14seer. For our home, there is only a $90/year difference in operating cost between 15seer and 16seer. so the payback would be 6.7 years to go from 15 to 16 seer. we would pick the 15 seer unit in this comparisson. Air source heat pump in the same range isn't even worth looking at. it only saves an additional $10/month. Again, not a big jump from 15 seer conventional gas. however, the dealer did mention that we would probably have to install a fresh air system if we go with gas heat -- this is due to foam spray in our attic and the corners of our house. we may need to rethingk a few things if we go with gas. this is where it gets interesting. we looked at geothermal. 1. the dealer sells all types of systems and manufactureres -- geothermal, air source heat pump, conventional ac... carrier, trane, frigidaire, water furnace... etc etc. 2. he assured me that he has hundreds of units in each system type installed in the local area. 3. there are two other geothermal companies in town, so should he and their whole company get hit by a bus tomorrow, there is still knowledgable geothermal service in the area. 4. I was initially interested in a closed loop system, but we do have a potable water well on site. a/c guy swears that in over 20 years he has not had a problem with open loop geothermal units on a potable water well in our area. local water quality is very high compared to other states where they have installed them. also says that the temperature in a closed loop varies b/c ground temp changes. says open loop is his preference due to consistent water temp from ground well. 5. top of the line Envision system from Water Furnace is $21,495 but the tax rebate is $6,449. 6. geothermal costs half as much to operate. operating cost for the three units is as follows... 15 seer unit = $142/month = $1708 per year 16 seer unit = $134/month = $1610 per year Geothermal = $ 61/month = $ 732 per year 7. we then put the units into a 6.5% interest loan scenario VS the monthly savings to calculate the investment payoff. Pay off for geothermal VS 15 seer is 4.1 years. Pay off for geothermal VS 16 seer is 3.8 years. 8. an installation tech showed us the geothermal loop piping. they use an iron to fusion weld the piping to the fittings. makes for a solid and thick joint. 9. hot water biproduct from geothermal can be used for hot water in our home. all comments are welcome. please shoot holes in all of this. thanks again!!! |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
| well, I"m no expert, but if you can get a geo-thermal system for 10 grand more than the heat pump option, I would go with the geo-thermal system. As long as you trust the contractors and they assure it won't be problematic. |
RE: new construction: geothermal VS air source hp VS conventional
| | |
| I have been on construction administration for a number of geo-thermal installations. Open vs closed loop. Basically the GPS is utilizing free energy from the ground or ground water. 2 primary types of configurations for geothermal- vertical wells or horizontal ground loops. Well drilling is not cheap. Open loop, vertical well, pump and dump systems are not permitted in some areas, but do offer a higher C.O.P coefficient of performance. The further apart the wells the better. Also, underground aquifers flow, so make sure your pump is "upstream" from your "dump". |
|
|
|
|