|
| Hello Everyone;
I came across this forum. Excellent resource - help for HVAC and related info and recommendations. I am building a new house. Kinda CUSTOM BUILD - with major mods from Builders 'spec display home'> > with 3 levels , approx 2980 Sqft; with 9ft celing in basement & 1st floor but STD HEIGHT WALLS on top floor.
a) walls = 2x6 with R24 + outside sheet R10 under siding
b)Useing 3M -PUNTURE PROOF FILM (inplace of TYVEK) commercial grade (makes the house real nice 'sealed envelope"
d) Builder's HVAC man = uses "ARMSTRONG" brands . and i am in favour of using LENNOX, or YORK/CARRIER So I need some help with EQUIPEMENT sellections: Here is what I ahd in mind:
can someone here who has got ANY of these two equipement
Anyone else with comments , feedback and help would be much appracited. Sorry this is my first post , not sure what else is missing
|
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| A 3000 sq ft house should have either two HVAC systems or at the very least zones for each floor. Any discussion about this? The sizes builder's HVAC man is suggesting seem oversized given the amount of insulation you plan to install. Ask to the heating and cooling load calculations. I would think a 21 SEER AC would be overkill for Canada. What are the average high temperatures in the summer? |
|
- Posted by alan_s_thefirst (My Page) on Thu, Nov 8, 12 at 14:01
| Ontario gets pretty hot and very humid, at least southern ontario does. OP didn't mention heat pump, at the very minimum they should be going for that. You won't need to burn any natural gas probably, outside of dec-feb I would think, the heat pump will draw heat from outside, and the newer ones are good down to close to 0c. I thought SEER was an energy efficiency rating, in which more, is more better-er? I personally would go as high as I could afford. |
|
| You are correct that a higher SEER rating results in more efficiency. But you have you consider the pay back on spending the extra money in order to get this efficiency. In most parts of the US a SEER rating of 16-18 is the best value. You have to live in a part of the country were the summer temperatures are consistently above 100 degrees F and electricity rates are high. Othewise you may never see a pay back during the life of the equipment. |
|
| 4.5 ton, 110MBtu seems rather large for new tight construction of a 3000sq ft house. One system with perhaps zoning should suffice. Will you have a 'Smart Meter'? I would recommend the Carrier Infinity Greenspeed system with either the gas furnace or fan coil unit, up to 20-SEER, 13-HSPF and up to 97.4% efficient gas furnace. Heat pump should be good down to about -20ËšC (-4ËšF) minimum. You will need the gas for the defrost mode. You will see a payback given your climate. You could also look into geothermal. SR |
|
- Posted by alan_s_thefirst (My Page) on Fri, Nov 9, 12 at 14:20
| Absolutely re the geothermal. I would have suggested it, but so many people dismiss it out of hand. Where I'm living right now, people have wood fires or pellet stoves pretty much as a matter of course. I think if they bit the bullet and spent more on geo up front, they'd save a bundle in the long run. It gets cold here, and there's no natural gas, just electric, fuel oil or propane. Even a heat pump, as I mentioned before. |
|
- Posted by david_cary (My Page) on Fri, Nov 9, 12 at 18:39
| Ontario is not some magical place where it is really cold. Minnesota has areas far colder than where most of the people in Ontario live. If you have NG and you build tight, geothermal is a ridiculous proposition. NG is super cheap and if you build tight in the relatively moderate Toronto area, your heating will be very cheap. Canada makes codes that are very strict regarding insulation. Seer 21 is another ridiculous proposition. The a/c cost for a house like this with seer 13 should be less than $100 a year. You can spend $4000 more for seer 21 and save $20 a year - ridiculous... |
|
- Posted by alan_s_thefirst (My Page) on Sat, Nov 10, 12 at 16:24
| Lots of places in BC have Geothermal, there are a lot of reasons why people don't consider it 'ridiculous,' there's a whole community/development in Kamloops that's Geothermal. Temps there are relatively high in winter, typically, it's not that much below freezing most of the winter, however, summers are pretty hot with makes Geo more attractive. NG may not stay this cheap forever, and a lot of people like the idea of reducing their dependence on fossil fuels. People make their own choices, it's not 'ridiculous' to them. |
|
| There's no one answer, such discussions tend to have significant regional variations due to power source differences and resource availability. Much of Canada has hydro power. While not without its own ecological detractors, it's cheap. In the US, more than half of electricity is produced with fossil fuels, and the majority of it uses dirty coal. Coal produced power is also cheap, and also not without significant eco-cost. Using hydro electricity instead of natural gas for heating does reduce fossil fuel use. Using coal produced electricity instead of a gas furnace doesn't, it just transfers the location where the pollution is produced from your house to the power plant. Around the US, there are some areas with relatively high power rates (I live in one of them) where heat pumps of any kind are WAAY too expensive to consider. |
|
- Posted by david_cary (My Page) on Sun, Nov 11, 12 at 5:23
| Ridiculous was a strong word. In areas where geo is very common, it can make sense. But to start talk about "absolutely" is a bit strong too. I don't know but I suspect S. Ontario is not 100% hydro. In general, it is far cheaper to build tight and insulate well rather than spend the money for geo. The only reason geo gets used in the US as much as it does is the rather significant gift from the government to do it. Which is a ridiculous waste of money on a new build because they just should have insulated better.... Since Canada requires good insulation, the payback for geo is long but if electricity is very cheap and hydro based, then I can see the argument. Then of course the argument against seer 21 is even stronger. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Heating & Air Conditioning Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.