Shop Products
Houzz Logo Print
sue_ct

Losing more heat than gaining from fireplace?

sue_ct
11 years ago

I have a 1958-60 house with an original wood burning masonry fireplace. I have used it mostly for fun/ambiance because I liked it and the cozy fire in the winters, until last fall. We had a storm in Oct. that left us with cold, snow and no power for days. During that time, the only heat I had was the fireplace. It was a full time job, lol, but by keeping a roaring fire going all evening until I went to sleep, I could get the temp in the open kitchen/livingroom area to about 73-74 degrees. Then I went to sleep, but had to keep the flu open and I would wake up to temps of 48 degrees in the house. I did not have glass doors and of coarse the open flu was probably a big problem with heat loss after the fire went out.

I had found in previous years that keeping a good fire going all evening would heat the rooms and keep them cozy warm. A small fire or one for just a couple of hours did nothing.

Is is possible to supplement heat with a wood fire in a fireplace by keeping it going all afternoon/evening instead of upping the thermostat for the entire floor when I home for the day? I have heard and read of coarse that fireplaces increase heating costs, send warm air out of the house, etc. But is there a point if it is kept going long enough that the radiant heat is greater than the heat loss?

I can certainly understand why a small or decorative fire for a couple of hours and an open flu would result in more heat loss than gain. But what about longer, hotter fires? It SEEMS to add heat not take away, but with the cost of oil this winter, I would like to understand it better, and when I might be breaking even or supplementing the heat and when I am just losing it.

I have since added glass doors so I can close them when the fire starts to die down and decrease heat loss during that time through the flu. The doors are not supposed to be closed during a fire, though, according to the instructions.

Would an iron fireback significantly increase the heat given off? I see them priced at around 300.00 to start.

After heating the two rooms with the fireplace for the first time ever last fall, it became obvious that at some point there clearly IS heat gain rather than loss with a wood burning fireplace. The back of the fireplace and chimney are in the attached garage, and there also does seem to be some increase in temp in the garage so I don't know if that helps any, maybe providing a little bit warmer insulating area before the really cold outside air.

If I am really wasting heat every time I use it, I am going to have to seriously cut down using it with the current price of oil this winter. That would be a shame because it is one of the few pleasures of winter for me, lol. But if I can break even or supplement the heat from the furnace a little, I certainly justify using it more, especially since I already have the wood.

Comments (5)

  • akamainegrower
    11 years ago

    A fire in a fireplace makes people nearby feel warmer because it produces primarily radiant heat. The truth is, however, that a fireplace is a net heat loser. In the first place, a very high percentage - perhaps as much as 90% - of the heat goes straight up the chimney and out. In the second place, an open damper as the fire dies down encourages the warm interior air to rapidly disappear up th chimney. A fireback increases the radiant heat produced and may - very marginally - make you feel a bit warmer. The glass doors once closed will - assuming they're air tight and most are not - prevent warm air from going up the chimney.

    The only real solution is a) a fireplace insert (fair to good) b) a free standing wood stove (much better) utilizing the present chimney. Modern EPA certified inserts and stoves are efficient and clean burning, spectacularly so when compared to an open fireplace. Installing either would be a considerable investment, but the payback period in savings in less oil burned and less wood used would likely be relatively short. Flame watching through the glass doors is just as addictive as an open fire, too.

  • sue_ct
    Original Author
    11 years ago

    If I can bring the ambient room temperature measured with a standard room thermometer, from 48 degrees to 74 degrees or so, with the fireplace, then it does more than make feel a "bit warmer", but I do understand you were probably referring to just the fireback there. I do understand the heat loss issue from the damper, since as I experienced, within 8 hrs most of it was lost, although maybe not all, since I don't know how cold the room would have gotten had I never used the fireplace. It seemed that had I had the glass doors at the time, there actually would have been some heat gain. I really am not considering heating with wood at this time because the cost of wood is quite high, and the work involved in cutting and splitting my own is not something I could do any more. I am just looking to use my fireplace for enjoyment without INCREASING my heating bill, and hopefully adding a small amt of heat gain if I use it judiciously only when I can keep it going long enough to heat the firebox and take advantage of the radiant heat.
    It might be that no one has really measured heat gain/loss from the average fireplace under circumstances other than the usual 2 or 3 hour fire with a couple of logs, and an open fireplace, so the rest might just be guess work. I was hoping since I had heard that the glass doors do help significantly, that someone had done some measurements about how much it helps, and if the end result is still a loss.

  • akamainegrower
    11 years ago

    If you're really interested in carefully measured figures for heat gain and loss, try www.hearth.com Well designed and carefully fitted glass doors probably do make a difference in that they would do the same thing as closing off the flue. If the doors can't be closed until the fire is well out, however, you will not have gained very much at all.

    It does not seem at all likely that burning wood in the fireplace is increasing your oil consumption. Where you're losing is in the firewood itself. The btu content of the wood is largely wasted by going up the chimney. If you like the fire and the warmth it provides, fine. The btu loss is probably compensated for by the enjoyment you're getting. BTW, I have heated in part or solely with wood for more than 30 years. Last winter's wood consumption was 5 cords. Oil consumption was 17 gallons. A more typical winter would be 6 cords/50 gallons. Wood at $275 a cord vs. oil at $3.65 a gallon is no contest.

  • sue_ct
    Original Author
    11 years ago

    Thanks. If the fire was a "net heat loser" then I was afraid not just all the heat from the fire went up the chimney, but some heat from the oil, too, causing me to burn MORE oil than if I had no fire. I close the doors when fire gets low, I don't wait for it to go out completely or get cold. The instructions just warned that too much heat could crack them. With a low fire and the flu open that didn't seem to be a problem. Thanks for the opinion.

  • lakelifer
    11 years ago

    Sue if you are using fuel oil for heating the rate of return for an EPA approved insert/free standing stove is less than 2 years with a high end appliance and around 1 year for a functional appliance. What investment yields this sort of risk free return?

    A fireplace has about 10% efficiency while it has a burning flame but there will be heat loss during the cooling phase of the fire. Your overall net heat gain likely is neglible.

    Glass doors would help you prevent heat loss during the cooling phase but there isn't as much radiant heat.