Return to the Fireplaces Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Wood burning inserts cost too much

Posted by glad2garden (My Page) on
Tue, Oct 20, 09 at 11:04

Good grief! I'd like a wood burning insert for my fireplace, just a simple thing to make it more efficient. I can't believe the prices I'm seeing. I'm better off not using the fireplace at all, and just using the gas furnace to heat the house. What's with these outlandish prices anyway? I don't want a fireplace that looks all that, just something useful!


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Wood burning inserts cost too much

How much were you thinking they cost?

Today's woodburners are engineered appliances designed to last a long time. They are the only thing besides automobiles that must be rated by the EPA for emmissions. So they are no longer the simple box with a hole in the top for smoke to escape.

These units are very efficient too. When I got my woodstove, it paid for itself within 2 years in oil savings. It was the best $2,700 I spent in a long time.


 o
RE: Wood burning inserts cost too much

"They are the only thing besides automobiles that must be rated by the EPA for emmissions." Unfortunately, that's not really the case. The EPA regulates almost every aspect of your life for better or worse; lawnmowers, PWC's ATV's weedwhackers, boats, trains, powerplants, the kind of wood that can be used on you're deck, the pesticides, fertilizers, household cleaning supplies, roofing etc. - pretty much EVERYTHING. Today's woodburners are better in many regards: in general they burn cleaner and use less wood to achieve the desired heat ouput through secondary burn or catalytic technology. Having said all that, you CAN achieve decent efficiency and a clean burn by proper firing of almost any older appliance- although it takes more care. You can find many older (pre-epa regulation) inserts for sale second hand in good shape for around $500, plus the cost of a liner if necessary. As far as newer woodstoves being designed to last a "long-time" i would disagree strongly with that statement as it applies to MOST, but not all modern stoves. I would expect most modern stoves (especially secondary burn) to last less than half as long as the average life of your ordinary pre-epa fisher or timberline style steel stove.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Fireplaces Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here