Maggie, The kids are adorable. What cute poses! Have you recovered from Sandy? Your town sounds like it was hammered. Our library is built up on a good sized hill and is still standing. The town square was flooded badly. The post office and fire departments suffered damage but will recover. Our famous bascule bridge was opened during the storm and came through in better shape than we had a right to expect. So, all in all, our public infrastructure is wet, battered, but still in operation. Every week it seems we have one fewer "Closed Due To Storm Damage" sign around town. Progress is slow but is happening. A few downtown businesses are gone for good though. You are so right about the volunteers, agencies, faith based groups. We met people from all over the country here to help. Even Hawaii. Most of the FEMA people were retired and FEMA calls them to service during times of disaster. They are well seasoned in disasters and their calming influence was much needed. I was very impressed with how well all the volunteer groups buoyed the kids' spirits. They were scared and Mom/Dad were busy and preoccupied but it seemed like somebody was always quick to spot need and offer support, a Kleenex, or miraculously show up with a teddy bear. It does make you proud to be an American. I was also proud that there was no looting in our area so officials could concentrate their efforts elsewhere. Thanks for checking in. Hope you're okay or will be soon. /tricia

There is another factor that no one has touched upon. I am a Plumber and I have spent many years earning a reputation amongst the local builders and plumbing inspectors as being a stickler for detail, to the point that often an inspector comes on the job site and when he or she sees me standing there they barely go through the motions of an inspection, relying upon the fact that they know my work. In return, I can command top money amongst the builders and I am still in high demand because they know that I will get the job done on time, in budget and have no follow-up problems. Along comes Mr & Mrs gotlotz acting in the stead of a competent GC and they immediately begin giving me attitude. NO problem. The first thing out of their mouth is that they will not settle for the quality of work we do on tract homes. Fine with me, never let it be said that I cheated you out of your bragging rights, I just add an additional 10 or 15% aggravation fee for putting up with the attitude. The quality of the work speaks for itself.

Berniek is right: Much of the blame here falls upon the shoulders of the politicians (led by then-President Clinton), who forced banks to begin some rather foolish lending practices. Alan Greenspan certainly did his share to push this concept of "everyone can borrow" during his time as Fed chairman. Between creative financing, no money down offers, and other such options, the government has given people plenty of rope with which to hang themselves. We Americans haven't proven ourselves to be particularly strong in the moderation and self-discipline categories over the last 30-40 years. Also, remember the climate that existed in the 90s, when I bought my first house: Spurred on by the soaring housing prices, people were convinced that buying "as much house as you can afford" was a good move. Housing was considered an investment that couldn't fail. Yes, the experts began preaching about "the housing bubble" long before it hit, but the masses couldn't grasp how this sure-thing could ever fall. And there's always been a (faulty) basic belief that "If I couldn't afford it, the bank wouldn't lend it to me." I fully agree with those who say that Real Estate agents will push buyers to their upper limits and beyond, and banks will lend what they can -- it's all about profits for them. Yet, the home owner DOES also bear the brunt of personal responsibility. After all, who cares most about whether I can afford my mortgage -- and still buy groceries and other things I need? Clearly, it's ME! I reap the rewards or punishments of my decisions, so I should do the math and know whether I can comfortably afford a house (or anything else) before I buy it. However, we've sort of left that thinking behind in today's buy-now-pay-later society. We're constantly told that "we deserve" this or that thing. That if we're going to finance it, we deserve to have exactly what we want. That "everyone" has debt. We've got to get past that.

As I have said all along over the past couple years, banks are motivated by different factors than a traditional seller. A potential retail buyer (or "nester") is unlikely to know exactly what those motivating factors are. If the note has been sold on the secondary market, and many have been, then it's the note holder & not the servicer making foreclosure/short sale decisions. Possibly, there are other factors such as the current borrower/owner having other outstanding loans with the bank that adds another wrinkle. Or, it could be how the bank is handling their accounting that makes the difference between short sale & foreclosure. It's really a fruitless process trying to second guess what they're doing & even more so...why. In many cases, due to legal reasons, a lender will decide they need to foreclose & due to confidentiality restraints they aren't supposed to discuss those reasons with you, a potential buyer of the distressed property. Another potential reason to not accept an offer from a retail buyer...they have sold a "block" of REOs to an invester & the particular property you are interested in is contained within that block. The lender has to foreclose to clear title before completing the transaction with the investor. We're seeing many more block invester sales now than 6-months ago. Anyway, it really is wasted energy trying to project your logic onto an institution that has a larger picture as their focus instead of an individual sale. Cash or financing? Well, there's financing & then there's "financing". Cash is cash no matter where it comes from. If you present an offer on a distressed property accompanied by a Commitment Letter you're set to go when you find a property that suits your needs. If you, instead, submit a Pre-approval Letter...well, that's really not worth the paper it's written on. For instance, we have an open Commitment Letter from our bank that allows us to purchase property(s) up to a certain amount based on our personal guarantee (no collateral). After we close, we give a first mortgage to our bank releasing the personal guarantee portion of the Commitment for another property purchase. That loan may contain up to a certain number of these properties obtained via just personal guarantee at any one time. How do you get a loan with just a personal guarantee? Well, again as I've been saying for a long time here, it pays large rewards to develop a "relationship" with a bank over a period of years rather than always shopping for the elusive "lowest rate, lowest fees". All I have to do is phone my bank & tell them I'm submitting an offer on such & such property & need a check in whatever amount on the closing date...I've got 45 days from the funding date to provide a lien. We've earned the bank's trust. It's a win-win for both of us. brickeye, "Let them stew a few more weeks and put in another offer through my attorney." I can assure you nobody at the bank is losing sleep over your offer & they are certainly not in a "stew". Executive management at the bank is entirely focused on the big picture. How a particular property fits into that puzzle only the bank knows. That's one of the reasons David, me, & others harp here regularily that to purchase a short or foreclosure from a bank requires a completely dispassionate approach. Interjecting what seems logical to a "nester" or even the small investor is almost guaranteed to be not relevant to the bank. I stress, again, the bank's need to focus on not only a larger picture but a different picture entirely. The large lenders holding tens of thousands of these bad loans have set-up varying proccesses to move that inventory off the books. But, even so, at any given time a single property may (or may not) fit into the "guidelines". A property's classification can change overnight suddenly making it difficult, or impossible, to purchase. For example, the bank has multiple loans to the same borrower (CC, mortgage, HELCO, car, boat). A restructure agreement is reached with the borrower & foreclosing on the real estate is necessary to clear up title. Or, a borrower sues the bank. That would halt everything until bank counsel has had an opportunity to review the validity of the suit. There are just so many reasons a bank suddenly decides to not offer a short sale...it's impossible to list all of them. I'm far more amazed at how many are actually closing than the fact some get stalled out mid-process. /tricia