Voting on Bonds vs Tax increase for School Repairs

15 years ago

The school district I live in is having a referrendum for new funds for school repairs and restoration. In the past funds have come from tax increases or (municipal?) bonds. This time they did a phone poll and determined 1) people are in favor of the repairs but 2) people are not in favor of raising taxes in this economy. I know very little about bonds, but it is my understanding that regular municipal bonds start paying out immediately for a period of time, 20 years for example.

So they have determined they want to issue bonds again. But not the same kind. These bonds will not start paying for 20 years. At which time, I can only presume, taxes would have to be increased. Issuing these bonds would also max out the district's credit line for the next 17 years. (There are other bonds expiring prior to these which would release some of the credit.)

I think people will vote yes on this because it is a 'free' school upgrade with no tax increase. I do not think most people realize the impact of the type of bonds that are being suggested.

Am I missing something here or is this just a way to put off today's debt until tomorrow? Which, isn't that HOW we got into this awful situation this country is in right now? Of course none of this is being pointed out in the propaganda being distributed.

Comments (4)

User
15 years ago
Municipal bond deals can be structured in different ways. Some, like you say, are issued and then mature annually starting right away. There are others, though, where the investment advisory firm contracts with the municipality to issue an option today so that the muni can have the right to issue at a later day. In this case, an option premium is paid by the muni up front. Deals can be structured in lots of different ways. In addition, there are accounting rules that define how the municipality needs to accrue the obligation for repaying. Without additional info, it's not possible to say if your s/d is trying to pull one over.

I'm also in greater Chicago and have worked with bonds for my entire career. What s/d are you referring to? I may be able to find out more of the specifics of the deal you are referring to.
christine
Original Author
15 years ago
D303. I read that it is a CAB, not sure if that automatically makes it a postponed payment. I think I tossed the original literature that stated all these details. :(

A big argument by the people who oppose this is that all this does is upgrade buildings, and apparently our test scores have rapidly been falling, so focusing on quality education over aesthetically pleasing buildings should be the priority, which I 100% agree with.

Here are a few sites, which may or may not be worth looking at, I didn't find the info I was interested in there other than some stats on how it will ultimately increase our taxes and how badly our test scores have fallen.

http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/beaconnews/news/elections/1508838,District-303-referendum_el040209.article

http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=283331

http://www.kcchronicle.com/articles/2009/03/16/r_9f3wbsuesnt4ysuilrfw/index.xml

This is the site for citizens against this bill. I believe what they state may be out of date, however. They do state that voting the measure down allows our taxes to go down, while voting the measure in ensures it will not go down and in fact there is no guarantee it won't go up due to these bonds (but this could be based on one of the old recommendations that isn't the one actually on the referendum since the site is out of date), . The download PPT has a lot of information on it I am not sure I totally understand, but maybe you would.

http://www.cfar303.org/

I would really like to better understand what exactly is happening with these bonds if you can find anything out. I really appreciate the offer!
Related Discussions
Allotment rent increase
Q
Comments (25)
Window insulation for cheapskates: get some sheets of Rmax insulation from Home Depot. 1" thickness works well. It needs to have the aluminum foil on both sides. Cut them to fit snugly into your window frames on the inside of the house. They need to be snug enough to stop most air flow. I guess you could use them on the outside too, if your frames are shaped right to hold them. Make sure the side with the printing on it is facing inside, so it doesn't look ugly from the outside. To conceal the insulation on the inside of the house, use curtains, blinds, etc. I had a room with two double doors to the outside. It was freezing cold in the winter, even with the heat on. With the Rmax installed, it's cozy warm, and uses very little heat. You need the foil on the outside surface to keep the sunlight away from the plastic foam. You need the foil on the inside surface to act as a vapor barrier. I keep the Rmax in over the summer on the south side. It keeps the house a lot cooler. I'm single, so I get to do stuff like this. I don't guarantee it will pass the wife test. For a better-looking window covering, look at the Comfortrack system (see link). The cellular shade gives good insulation, and the plastic strips stop air flow. I have two windows with this, and it's excellent. But it's a couple of hundred bucks per window. Here is a link that might be useful: Comfortrack system
...See More
Laughable real estate taxes
Q
Comments (41)
jillinnj that's a great link. It points out a factor that I think we keep missing here with our comparisons and justifiable rants. The tax on a property is relative to the income of the owner. The house highlighted in the original post has high property tax, but if the owner income is proportionate the taxes are not a burden. My original question was what do you pay as a *proportion* of income because I think that's a more realistic indicator of impact on lifestyle. I'm wondering if people in NJ, for example, are more likely to be house poor because of the ratio of income to tax or if the people in TN are living a relatively easier life with more *proportionately* discretionary income. Everything is relative. My DH could not earn the same income he currently does in a small town in TN but an equal house in terms of size and amenities would probably cost significantly less and be taxed far less. It *could* have a significant impact on lifestyle. Quality of life is a very subjective qualifier - I might hate small town life in TN or I might hate city life in NJ but I don't know of another way to get the same sense of what it costs to live where. Certainly there will always be very high incomes in low cost of living areas but not likely to be the norm. But in some places a property owner really has to be in a high income bracket nationally just to be able to afford housing. It's not easy to make this an apples to apples comparison.
...See More
Your RE Taxes & What They Buy
Q
Comments (45)
My house is taxed at 5.3% of the assessed value, which is 35% of the estimated market value. The market value is about 183k which is probably pretty close, within 5k or so. So about 1.9-2.0% of market value. About 60% of the tax is for school; another 10% is specifically for mental illness, mental retardation & developmentally disabled services; another 5.6% for children's services; 1.6% for parks & zoo; 1% for seniors; 5.3% for libraries; & the rest is divided between city, township, & county. Property tax consumes a full 10% of my take-home pay. The fairly quiet (except for the freight trains and jets), clean, conveniently located neighborhood is worth it. I also pay city (2%) and state income tax, and 6.5% sales tax. I really don't remember which tax the trash collection, street maintenance, police & fire etc derive from, but the city provides all. Water is billed separately. Services are really quite good, but streets have deteriorated a bit the past 2 years as the city has had to rip out existing sidewalk curb cuts at all intersections and redo them--someone sued on account of the ADA, said they were too steep, and must have at all intersections. So now we have very gentle wheelchair slopes at intersections without sidewalks, and at the bottoms of steep hills (some of those zigzag to produce the correct grade, and consumed large chunks of front yard), and on residential streets that have steep driveway cuts every 30 feet---and potholes in the streets. They tell us they will likely have to ask for more tax for the schools. Otherwise they might have to lay off the weight room attendents and ask the various coaches to teach a class or two. Or drop the yearbook class for an english credit where your grade depends on your writing skill, rather than on how many ads you sell--
...See More
Rent vs Buy: how the equation may change under 2017 budget
Q
Comments (72)
But there probably does need to be some kind of phase-out period, because people have made financial commitments based on the presence of this deduction. There is absolutely no reason for a phase out, at all. No one is going to have less money if the standard deduction is raised. NO ONE! No one who used the old standard deduction to calculate the payment of a house will suddenly not be able to afford it because of this. NO ONE! The plan, if that is what we want to call it, just calls for increasing the standard deduction. This means that most (in fact, almost all) homeowners whose mortgages are below $160,000 (which is the national average) will pay less in taxes than they currently do. All this "plan" does is lowers the differential benefit from the mortgage interest deduction. Let's just look at some examples of how it works, assuming a married filing jointly couple in the 25% tax bracket here is a comparison. Different tax brackets will change the amounts but the direction and magnitude will remain the same. This plan will lower the differential benefit. In other words if we compare someone with $15,000 or mortgage interest to someone with $5,000 of mortgage interest we can see the comparative benefit is reduced for most people. However, no one will have less money and more than 80% of the country will have more money. I understand the argument that for a few people (mostly those buying expensive houses) this appears to be disincentive to own a more expensive home. However, I would argue that giving more than 80% of the country significantly more money will make up the difference.
...See More
joyfulguy
15 years ago
On a radio program on Sunday morning discussing the potential future for our economy and society, one of the important statements that caught my ear was that, since the future depends on innovative people, that we should cherish our teachers, especially the investigative, curious ones that are innovative, especially that kind who teach our youngest kids.

Those kids need to develop various aspects of their minds to their full extent, for they will be the ones who keep our society innovative and on the edge of discoveries in future - and they are happening at an increasing rate.

Remember - it's our 5 year olds who teach us how to operate the new electronic toys!

So - let's cherish our teachers.

And equip our kids well.

So that they can be at work at higher profile work than flipping hamburgers when they become adults.

So that they can fund your pensions ... at 80, I'll be out of the game within a few short years.

Do you figure that there may be unemployment in heaven?

How about one group being able to arrange things so that they can bully others?

If we figure that it won't work in heaven - why do we do it here?

ole joyful
User
15 years ago
If you google "schedule of outstanding bonds d 303 st charles", you'll get a series of hits.

This one, which I can't copy a url to, is a power point presentation by the financial advisor PMA Securities Inc about what's going on. Start by taking a look at this.
[PPT]
Presentation to
File Format: Microsoft Powerpoint - View as HTML
Jan 20, 2009 ... St. Charles Community Unit School District 303 ... All of the DistrictÂs outstanding debt are current interest bonds. ...
www.d303.org/Portals/0/summit303/docs/012009_St_Charles_303_Board_Meeting2.ppt - Similar pages

Here's the 2008-2009 operating budget for your district...
http://www.d303.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=K9iabzkzfDc%3d&tabid=83&mid=3952

I'll do more digging later today.

Voting on Bonds vs Tax increase for School Repairs

Comments (4)

User

christine
Original Author

Related Discussions

joyfulguy

User

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

Voting on Bonds vs Tax increase for School Repairs

Comments (4)

User

christineOriginal Author

Related Discussions

joyfulguy

User

COMPANY

BUSINESS SERVICES

GET HELP

CONNECT WITH US

christine
Original Author