Not that stock issuing entities haven't merged, disappeared, spun off for years, the break up of ATT & T really brought it to a lot of people's doorsteps. But, in your case - Contel became GTE and GTE became Verizon, so your concern would only be with Verizon now. Contel and GTE and any mountain of paper are no longer factors in the sale of some or all of your Verizon stock. As each company became something else, you were probably asked to surrender the certificates eventually receiving new certificates. Now you should be holding only Verizon cerificates. What I would hold on to would be the receipt(s) for your initial Contel purchase(s), the confirmation of the GTE buyout, and the confirmation of Verizon's buyout of GTE. Would also keep all the Verizon statements you've received since the buyout. I kind of look at it like not saving insurance policies and all the paperwork for cars I don't have anymore.

We have Vannie and Kelly beat.We will be giving the IRS $18,000.! See what I mean about almost enough to buy a new car? LOL Talk about Ouch! All because we were fortunate enough to inherit oil property from in-laws in 81 and were even more fortunate to be able to sell last year at a very good price.We have paid an average of $3000. every year since in taxes on the oil royalties on 2 producing wells,plus about $1200. a year in property taxes.I think it is a little unfair to have to pay 18% taxes on that one time windfall but that's the way it is.So much for being one of those "rich" Texas oil people! LOL

time for this to drop down

Maybe a fund of about $1.333 million at about 3% would be a more feasible scenario. Not providing for sale of some assets, rather probable in a 1.5 - 2 million or larger asset portfolio situation (some paying almost no dividends or none), which would result in capital gains/(losses) to relate to current income. In earlier years, if one received $10,000. of dividends from Canadian Corporations, one added (Grossed-up) 25% to that figure to find the taxable amount of dividend income, to report $12,500. on the tax return. Then 13.333% of that amount, or Dividend Tax Credit of $1,666.63 was deducted from the tax that one owed. Non-refundable tax credits were available to most taxpayers, and those along with the dividend tax credits, allowed "taxpayers" with no other income to have about $27,000. solely dividend income to have nil tax to pay. Now this situation is called "Ineligible dividends" and the ratios are as indicated above. A new category of "Eligible dividends", which seems to include dividends paid by most stock-exchange-listed Canadian corporations, are grossed up by 45%, i.e. $10,000. cash is reported as $14,500. on the tax return - and have a Dividend Tax Credit of 18.9655% of the taxable amount, or $2,750. deducted from the tax owing. This, added to the Non-refundable tax credits, allows a "taxpayer" to have nearly $40,000. before becoming tax-liable. Which may be pushed higher in various other circumstances that I think that I outlined above. Most long-term Canadian residents, including non-employed people (e.g. housewives), qualify for Old Age Security at age 65 of about $5,800. annually. As this is a non-contributory Federal benefit, if the taxpayer's annual income is over about $55,000., part of that Old Age Security is clawed back by the gov't. The clawback amount increases, till the total amount of one's O.A.S. is clawed back when one's income is in the mid- to high $80,000.00s. Cash dividend of $40,000. plus 45% becomes $58,000. on tax return, plus $5,800. O.A.S., close to $64,000. taxable, will result in substantial clawback of one's O.A.S. benefit. Plus reduction in senior's Age credit, which reduces with increased "income" - whether "real" or "imagined" income! "Gross", huh? Canada Pension Plan (mandatory contributions by both employer and employee, therefore a contractual benefit) allows members who are "substantially retired" (rather loosely defined) to stop contributing and begin to claim benefits at any time between age 60 and 70, with 6% annual reduction if claimed under 65 and 6% annual addition if over 65. Taxable. Private pension plan benefits are available to some people. Benefits of up to $1,000. from private pension plan or RRIF payments qualify one for a non-refundable tax credit, dollar for dollar, up to $1,000. If one is age 69, partial owner (the government being the other partial owner) of a tax-deferred retirement account (RRSP), it must be closed out by the end of that year - or the rules provide that it will be closed out as of Dec. 31 of that year and the total amount added to income in that year. Scarcely anyone chooses this route!! Most personal money managers prefer to use the RRSP money: 1) to buy an annuity (not so hot an idea in these low-interest times), or 2) to roll over into a Registered Retirement Income Fund. With a RRIF, no more deposits allowed, and required to remove at least a given percentage annually, beginning at about 7.5% and rising to 20% annual withdrawal at age 90 and later. Residue in a RRIF on owner's death: if no spouse, infant or disabled dependent kid is added to deceased's income in year of death, or can be fully transferred to one in spouse's name with no tax consequences - yet. Residue is added to current income in year of surviving spouse's death. Where these or other income situations are obtained, the tax reduction is still substantial - but one doesn't avoid tax entirely: one is then a taxpayer (no quotation marks)! There are some other games that an astute portfolio manager can employ, if she/he is willing to a take some moderate short-term risks. There are several fairly smart women in the monthly investment shareclub that I've attended for about 7 years. Good wishes for wise and constructive use of retirement assets. ole joyful