I don't think you can remove just the ads unless you would use an audio editor. When it asks what file you want to convert, browse by clicking on the folder just to the right of where it says "Select the video file". I like using the youtubedownloader to convert, because I can download all the videos and convert later at my leisure. For the most part, I do use the Firefox add-on to download. Just easier when you are on the youtube page to click "download". HTH, Jean

Yes same as firefox 3----- no it will not replace IE6 you will just have an extra browser an that's good to have for trouble shooting like now. The only time IE6 is replaced is if you install another IE browser. Like IE7 OR IE8 So give it a shot nothing to loose and maybe things to gain.

I apologise for the different threads. It was very late, I was tired, and determined to "fix it" before I went to bed, and becoming more irritated because I couldn't. Here's the scenario: Usually watch YouTube music videos a while in the evening, so, day before this happened, everything was fine, shut computer down, went to bed. Next evening, logged into YouTube with the error message: you must have Java off or not have latest Adobe Flash. I had NOT changed any files, etc. Checked the Adobe I had, went to Adobe website to check. Installed the latest Adobe Flash. I also installed the latest Adobe Reader and Shockwave Player, since mine were out of date. And, although I didn't opt to install it, the Adobe Air showed up on my programs list. I also went to Java and got their latest updates. Videos stil won't play, so I came here with the problem. Advice was to go to Adobe site, get the uninstaller,download to desktop, close browser, uninstall Adobe again, then go to Adobe page and re-install. I did, and still videos won't play. I have an Dell from 2002, Windows XP Home, 32-bit, 7.30GB of free space.

Thanks for the responses. There's a large body of thought (and evidence, actually) that "juvenile spaying" is the way to go. I did a LOT of reading on the topic before taking THE BABY in for the procedure, and all of it was very in favor. It's only considered a juvenile spay if they're 16 weeks or younger and she was right at 16 weeks. In shelters, they're spaying them at six weeks old. The new anesthetics (I'm told) are a world apart from the older anesthetics - which was the main reason for delaying surgery until a dog had some age on her. The pros are, the puppies heal much faster and there are fewer complications. The cons are (this is my own opinion), it's not pretty to lock a puppy in a crate with an e-collar for most of her 24-hour day. This is precious socialization time, and she *has* to be quiet so she has to either be on drugs, or spend a bit of time in the crate - for the first few days, anyway. And now with this complication, she's in there until the infection heals (which I hope is no more than a couple days away). She can not be running around and/or jumping - which is what she longs to do. Prior to this, we had a lot of fun, taking long walks and going to the dog park every day and playing catch in the back yard. She was a tired dog and a good dog. Now she's been cooped up for six days and is all fired up. I dunno. The juvenile spay is supposed to be THE thing. I thought it was the best thing to do for my little dog and I spent a whole lot of time doing my research before I made these arrangements. We got into trouble when she licked her stitches and/or when she insisted on jumping up and down like she was a coiled spring. Rose