|
| I was on the Blue Oval Forum and came across this little ditty.
Opinions? "...Ford is developing a new form of automotive propulsion, and the implications for the American Auto Industry are huge. The Hydraulic Hybrid could be the greatest innovation since the internal combustion engine itself, and Ford is on the inside track with its F-150 Hybrid. New Tech Spy Has learned details about the system that are simply amazing and could put Ford in a commanding position in the fiercely competitive full size pickup market.
|
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| Opinions? - There's more to an engine than good mileage. There still are a few people buying F-150s because they need something that can haul a lot. There's no information here on towing capacity or payload. A "Hydraulic Hybrid" F-150 is a non-starter if it can't haul close to the 1800 pounds or tow the 6500 pounds the current model can. It's a tall order. I certainly hope Ford is successful with it. But I think this article is extraordinarily optimistic about this engine being a savior for Ford. |
|
| If this was true, then someone(VW or Nissan or Honda or GM) would sell a normal sized vehicle to go 75 MPG....or more.. 5 years ago my VW pickup averaged 45 mpg, just by trimming away excessive and wasted size and performance..and of course using the Diesel, an old design yet... I do not know about the hydraulic technology, but wild claims about high MPG do abound... |
|
| i dont care how many miles per gal. it gets, i dont want to drive a full size pickup. now if ford can get their miata to get over 90 mpg, then i`am interested. |
|
| Hydraulic fluid is incompressible. It can not be used to store energy. To store energy you need a fluid that can be compressed, like air. There could be some sort of hydraulic drive component to the system, but the method for storing energy must be something else. |
|
| **Hydraulic fluid is incompressible. It can not be used to store energy.** Not as far fetched as you think. Same kind of idea is used on some man lift equipment used by utilities...not to drive the truck down the road, but to raise the boom smoothly. Has been used sinse the 60's. The energy is stored in an accumulator. The accumulator has an area filled with some kind of inert gas. That gas is what can be compressed against the fluid, thus storing engergy. From what I've heard on the subject, on a vehicle it would only work in stop and go driving situations. If that's the case, your 60 mpg pickup would still only get 17 driving down the road. The increase in mileage would come from around town driving...like a UPS truck or mail delivery vehicle. jmo |
|
- Posted by quirkyquercus (My Page) on Sun, Sep 3, 06 at 10:17
| If comparable in price and capabilities and was a solid 60 MPG, not some inaccurate EPA estimate.... (The window sticker would have to read something like 75/100) then I would get one. If ford is reading this, now they know what they have to do to reclaim a loyal Toyota driver. IF only 60 in stop & go conditions, that isn't going to cut it. |
|
- Posted by christopherh (My Page) on Tue, Sep 5, 06 at 8:03
| I just read where UPS is going to use this technology in it's new trucks. Lot of weight there, so the hauling ability questions can soon be answered. I agree, I too need a vehicle that can haul a cargo trailer all over the northeast and a Prius just won't do. Most of the gas usage in the larger vehicles is spent pulling away from stop. After they are up to speed, it's "rolling weight" so that figure HAS to increase also. So even if the truck gets, say, 30 MPG on the highway, that's 100% better than now since my Dakota only gets 15. The engine type (gas or diesel) is immaterial since in place of an electric motor there will be a hydraulic motor. And yes, it will at this time be best suited for stop and go use, but the potential is there for OTR use also. But can you imagine the effects of a taxi fleet using this technology? If taxi fleets in the major cities were to be able to convert, the fuel savings would be enormous! And since UPS is going this route, if more companies were to convert it's "six wheelers", again, more fuel savings and less dependence. And no need to replace expensive batteries! Do a Google for Hydraulic hybrids and see what comes up. Even the EPA is backing this as a way to save fuel. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Cars Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.