I live in an apartment that is a pet free community. My fiance and I moved into this apartment temporarily for six months because it was the best deal and close to where we lived. I had a cat previously, and ended up giving to my parents. After a while of having my cat, my father got irritated by it and insisted that I take it back or he was going to drop it off at the Humane Society. I didn't want to violate my lease by taking a my cat back in, nor did I want my cat to end up at the Humane Society. I talked it over with my fiance and we decided to take the cat back in.

Our lease is up at the end of March and we have already made plans to move to a different apartment complex that will allow us to have pets. We figured we could hide the cat for a month. This weekend I recieved a letter stating that management had seen a cat in the window of our apartment. Oops! Guess we got caught. I accept that. After all, I did sign a lease stating that I would not have a pet at any time in the apartment.

The part I am a little weary about, however, is when it comes to carpet replacement. Looking over my lease and the letter that was sent to me, it seems that they WILL charge me for new carpet. Also, I have a feeling the charge of new carpet will be high because the carpet is under a year old. My understanding is that if the carpet is older than three years old, it is usually replaced anyway and the tenant has a better chance paying less for carpet replacement.

What I wanted to know is if there is any chance that I could reason with management. The cat has only been here for four days. My parents have decided to take care of the cat for another month after I groveled with them. There is absolutely no staining. The hair and dander that has accumlated on the carpeting could easily be cleaned and vaccuumed. My feeling is that it would be a large waste of time and labor to replace this carpet not to mention a chunk of money. If they could prove there were any pet stains I would have no problem, but there is none.