Shop Products
Houzz Logo Print
2littlefishies

36' Built in Fridge seems SMALL- Should I try a 42'?

2LittleFishies
12 years ago

We are a family of four. When opening a 36" built in fridge at my GC's home my husband and I were surprised how small it was. Right now we have a regular old refrigerator.

Would a 42" be a good difference? Which companies make one that would be on the lower cost side (if that even exists?) lol

Comments (11)

  • beekeeperswife
    12 years ago

    We went to a 48". We can't go back. It's awesome. Even my dh became a believer.

  • 2LittleFishies
    Original Author
    12 years ago

    That would be awesome but I don't know if we'll have the room. Which is the manufacturer that makes various sizes where you mix and match the fridge and freezer?

  • deeageaux
    12 years ago

    Least expensive 42" would be GE Profile,KitchenAid,and Northland. Northland giving you the best temp performance but worst noise and energy efficiency.

    Plenty of companies offer all-fridge and all-freezer columns. The least expensive would be Frigidaire, Northland,and Liebherr.

    Also companies such as Sub-Zero,GE Monogram, Thermador,Miele, and Gaggenau make columns.

  • ahmack
    12 years ago

    I too had the same reservations about buying a 36" built-in. Transitioning from a regular depth fridge (which seemed to never run out of space) to a built-in was not the nightmare I had anticipated. The thing about regular-depth fridges is that random food items tend to pile up in the back of the fridge, and things end up getting hidden. With a built-in fridge, I have found the use of interior space to be much more efficient, and I love being able to see everything. It also has made me a more conscientious shopper, as I know that while I have ample space for groceries, I can't go overboard, and buy 12 of everything that's on sale. I have a friend who owns the KA 42" french door, and she doesn't think the marginal gain in cubic feet was worth giving up counter space. If you really need to squeeze in a few extra feet, go for the 42". If you think you can spare the extra bit of space, I would say that the 36" has met our needs and then some.

  • nutcake
    12 years ago

    We are a family of three. I also wanted a 36" built-in but was advised against it by the salesperson. He showed me the lack in freezer space as the reason. We do not typically fill up a fridge, but do buy some bulk frozen items; freeze leftovers for later, etc. I reluctantly went with the 42". The fridge we would have been fine with the 36", but the freezer even in the 42" is tiny and almost inadequate. I was surprised. I didn't have room for a 48". I do like the shallowness of built-ins, but the freezer space is a problem. What do we store? Bags of frozen veggies, some packages of meats I don't have time to cook immediately, small pint ice cream, some leftovers, extra lunch meat, cheese. Some frozen dinner foods in small packages. But it amazingly fills up quickly. Based on my experience, don't go with the 36" built-in.

  • ourhouse25
    12 years ago

    We ended up deciding on a 36" built-in plus 2 refrigerator drawers. Configuration worked out best that way for both space and usefulness.

  • mydreamhome
    12 years ago

    If you're set on a built-in, 48" is the way to go. I'd rather lose 6" of counter/cabinet space than go any smaller. The built-ins are just too shallow IMO, so you have to get them as wide as you can to make up for it. Have you considered counter depth fridges? We have a 24.1cuft Kenmore Elite badged Samsung CD fridge & love it--plus it costs ALOT less. It always helps to have a 2nd fridge in the garage, too.

  • sophie123
    12 years ago

    We have a builtin 36" FD but with a basement fridge that is just down the stairs. It works for our family of 5. It was tradeoff on the size on pantry cabinet for us as they are next to each other. The 42 FD options were limited so that was a factor too. If i had to do it again i would consider what ourhouse25 did. especially with kids - its more convenient.

  • live_wire_oak
    12 years ago

    If having the more integrated look is important to you, then you will accept the tradoffs of more cost and less storage. But, it sounds as though those tradoffs are not acceptible to you or your DH.

    Consequently, I'd challenge you as to whether or not you actually need a built in for your kitchen design. You have issues with both their cost and the space that they give you. Budget and built in are words that don't belong in the same sentence, and if you have large storage needs, they don't belong together either unless you have a large kitchen plus backups elsewhere.

    A plain freestanding fridge will be significantly cheaper (4-10K cheaper), provide more interior room (as much as 30 cu ft in a standard 36" space vs the 21 of a 36" built in), and can still be enclosed with cabinet panels on the side to make it look more a part of the room. You just give up the cabinet panels on the front----which isn't cheap either. The front cabinet panels will cost you another 1-2K.

    Seems like a no brainer to me unless you are in a pretty spendy part of town that requires a built in to keep up with the neighbors.

    Is this 30 cubic feet of storage
    {{gwi:1495058}}

    ">

    worth 4-10K more to you than this 30 cubic feet of storage?

  • 2LittleFishies
    Original Author
    12 years ago

    HELLO : )

    Thanks everyone. I started this back in December and since then have already decided to skip built in and get a 36" stainless counter depth. Thanks so much though!

    Fishies