Cable Jacket = Raceway?

gblentzMarch 30, 2012

Could someone please offer some clarification of 725.55(A)? As it seems to read, LV and line conductors are prohibited from sharing the same raceway. But does the outer jacket of a multi-conductor cable constitute the cable's own raceway, insofar as of The Code is concerned? More to the point (and noise issues notwithstanding), can speaker wire, CAT-5, RG-6, etc., be installed in a common conduit with NM?

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Ron Natalie

Do you mean 725.51(A)? There is no 725.52.
If we're talking about running multiple conductors/cables in a conduit/raceway, the derating (or as the 2011 code calls it, ampacity adjustment) rules apply.

There are issues installing NM in conduit PERIOD. You need to explain what it is you are trying to do.

    Bookmark   March 30, 2012 at 10:48AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

Not 725.52--725.55. Well there WAS a 725.55, at least up through the 2005 NEC anyway... seems to have been either rescinded or moved. It basically stated that Class 2 & 3 circuits can't occupy the same raceway as Class 1. I was looking for clarification of "raceway," and whether the sheath on an NM cable would serve to fulfill the separation clause in this case. If the statute is no longer on the books it's a moot point, but I can't imagine they'd just do away with something like that. Any idea where it went?

I have a 1-1/2" conduit from our basement to the attic space through which RG-6 is presently run. I may have a need for line voltage in the attic at some point, and the conduit would greatly simplify installing a run of NM.

I'm guessing derating is one of the issues of NM in conduit to which you refer. Are there others?


    Bookmark   March 30, 2012 at 12:53PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

That is not a conduit or raceway. It is a sleeve for protection/accessibility.
I see no problems running NM in that sleeve, in fact it's done all the time.

    Bookmark   March 30, 2012 at 1:39PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Ron Natalie

I mistyped. 725.55 from 2005 is now 725.136 in the 2008 and later codes.

You can't run the class 2 and 3 in the cable with the NM jacketed wire. Sorry. The insulation on it isn't up to it.

Passing through three stories is not a "sleeve" Petey.
The cable will need to be derated.
But that still doesn't change the fact that you can't mix it with other unrelated cables that have insulation that is not up to the job.

NM isn't class 1.
RG-6 cabling isn to any of the Article 725 stuff most likely anyhow, it comes under article 820.

    Bookmark   March 30, 2012 at 4:54PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

ronnatalie, I'm trying to understand... I'd always thought that you could mix and match coax, CAT-5/5e/6, HDMI, VGA, remote signaling cable, whatever, as long as it's less than 48v, and shove it all down a conduit together. Is this not correct?

If it is correct, then the point of my question is whether or not the sheath on an NM cable constitutes a "raceway" in the eyes of The Code. If it indeed does, why should the insulation on any other cable external to that raceway matter one way or another?

If The Code does not consider the NM sheath to be a proper raceway then, naturally, the point is moot. :-)

    Bookmark   April 2, 2012 at 8:11PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Ron Natalie

I didn't say you couldn't, I was pointing out that neither NM nor TV coax is covered by Art. 725.

NM is not a raceway.

NM in the conduit will need to be derated EVEN if there is no data wiring within.

    Bookmark   April 3, 2012 at 8:12AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

"mix and match coax, CAT-5/5e/6, HDMI, VGA, remote signaling cable, whatever, as long as it's less than 48v, and shove it all down a conduit together."

OK except for "remote signalling cable" depending on if it falls into a recognized NEC control group (power limited, etc.)

What you cannot do is put NM or power wiring in the same conduit (or any other raceway) without some physical separation unless you can show that all the wiring has insulation up to the highest voltage in the raceway.

    Bookmark   April 3, 2012 at 10:25AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

Personally I would not have any problem running NM with coax or cat5 in this "chase".
No way I'd call it a "conduit".

That's just me though.

    Bookmark   April 3, 2012 at 5:30PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

To me it is clear that running individual conductors, such as THHN, in a conduit or raceway with CAT6 (and similar) would require that all have insulation rated for the highest voltage in the conduit or raceway. But nothing prohibits running the NM cable, which has an outer covering, and the CAT6 through the same bored hole in a framing member. In my mind, a sleeve consisting of PVC conduit running from basement to attic in a house for the purpose of installing cables after the house is completed is suitable for both the NM cable and the CAT6 together.

    Bookmark   April 4, 2012 at 10:09AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

A stub bay (AKA a 'chase' is not a 'raceway' under the NEC.

Nor is the hole in a wood member.

A section of conduit IS a raceway, even if it is not part of a conduit system.

Derating is not required in short lengths of conduits used for physical protection by an exemption.

It is sort of left to the AHJ to decide when the 'short lengths' become excessive.

There is no exemption allowing other wiring besides power wiring in the conduit.

If you want a conduit run from basement to attic for non-power wiring put one in.
But keep the branch circuit wiring in a separate conduit.

Your individual AHJ may have an opinion on this.

Try asking them ahead of time, preferably in writing (even though they CAN change their mind at ANY time).

    Bookmark   April 4, 2012 at 10:25AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

My understanding was always that all of the wires/cables had to have an insulation rating at least equal to the highest voltage present.

Some cheap "alibaba" RG-6 cable I found on google has a rating of "300/500V" - running 120 next to it? Go ahead.

"West Penn Wire" claims 300V for theirs. Again, go ahead.

I wasn't able to find anything in the first page of google results LESS than 300V. Indeed, the CATV wiring out back in our server room also says 300V.

Check the cable to be sure of course...

    Bookmark   April 17, 2012 at 9:26AM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Inspection Report
Had a gorgeous 1909 house inspected yesterday and don't...
Same circuit for AC air handler and whole-house fan?
Hi, I've got a furnace/air handler in my attic. I was...
Troubleshooting Kohler 12RES Problem
I have a Kohler 12RES generator with an RDT 100 Amp...
Can you make a splice inside one of these?
The reason I ask is my neighbor's house was destroyed...
Two fans on same circuit in different rooms, can't get wiring right
So here's the situation. I have two ceiling fan/lights...
Sponsored Products
Rainbow Blossom 1' Light-Up Tree
$14.99 | zulily
DW 3528 LED Strip Light 60/m 8mm wide Foot
Bowl Large Phantom Red Bowl Pendant with 58-Inch OA Drop
P591 Semi-Flushmount by George Kovacs
$240.00 | Lumens
Designers Edge L131 Green Portable Work Light - Green - L1312
$48.35 | Hayneedle
&'Costa | Supernova Spot Pendant Light
Possini Euro Design White Flower Pendant Chandelier
Euro Style Lighting
Cascade Mini Pendant by WAC Lighting
$404.50 | Lumens
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™