Moving a toilet 101

kathfarrNovember 18, 2006

Hello - We are considering moving our toilet as part of a bathroom remod. The (wood) subfloor has already been removed because it needs to be replaced, so the drain is already exposed.

We are considering moving the toilet approx. 2 feet to allow for extra storage space in the room. We have heard two schools of thought about moving the toilet.

1) Don't do it because it is expensive and can be problematic.

2) It's not a big deal to move a toilet.

What are the mechanics involved in a toilet move? We have a limited budget for the remod so if it's cost prohibitive, we probably wouldn't do it.

We are very confused and would appreciate any opinions. TIA

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
lazypup

It depends upon a couple factors.

If you are moving it in the same direction as the floor joists go it may not be a big deal but if it requires going at right angle to the floor joists you will need to change the framing which can get rather expensive.

A toilet is required to have a 3" drain line.

Under the International Residential code a 3" line may run 12' from a trap weir to the vent, however if the line serves only a toilet it may run an indefinite length.

The Uniform Plumbing Code limits the length of a 3" diameter line to 6' from the toilet to the vent.

    Bookmark   November 18, 2006 at 3:12PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
pinocchio

It is also a common practice to move a toilet during a renovation. Since you are down to the subfloor, it doesnÂt get any easier than that  except, of course that you may have to cross into another joist bay, as LP noted. But, I wouldnÂt let this opportunity go by, if you want to gain the other benefits.

Depending on who does the work, it can have an extra cost attached to it. In this DIY forum, it could be a Âwash, cost-wise. Two feet is normally not a serious consideration. Think of the original design. Given an area to work with, virtually any layout is within the range of possibilities.

BTW, LazyPup, I am not sure if I understand the statement, "Â if the line serves only a toilet it may run an indefinite length." I think you have mentioned this before. The reason I ask: doesnÂt any installation for a toilet require hand-washing facilities, too?

Is it then reasonable to say the line serves on a toilet? Or, considering the modest sink drainage, would the two fixtures fall under that rule?

Pinoke

    Bookmark   November 19, 2006 at 10:40AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
lazypup

Under the International Residential Code if the toilet is on a separate branch from the main drain it does not require a vent. If it shares the branch with a shower or lavatory you must meet all the venting requirements.

    Bookmark   November 19, 2006 at 11:29AM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Fleck 9100 SXT Programming/Settings
I am finally installing my new Fleck 9100 SXT!!! Thanks...
rss1978
Improving water pressure to outside spigot
I would like to improve the pressure and flow rate...
greasetrap
Costco Water Ridge Dual Flush -- Need reviews
Any more reviews on the dual flush Water Ridge toilet?...
smudgecat99
Fleck 5600 Econominder - Salty Tasting Water
I just installed a new 1.5 cu ft water softener with...
larry_a_williams
what brand water softener
have 2400 sq ft rancher on town water. do not have...
questionoftheday
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™