life insurance

jet_nyJuly 5, 2007

My friend is 62 and has an adjustable life insurance with 250,000 face value, a premium of 2500 per year and a cash surrender value of around 30K. she was gonna stop the insurance and take the cash but has not done so. She skipped payment for 2 years and they are treating it as a loan @ 8.25%. Her accountant told her to keep paying the premium because even if she lives another 30 yrs she will be paying only 75K in premium but her kids will get 250K benefits tax free as inheritance or to pay estate taxes etc. when she dies. I said if it was me and I can afford it (and only then) I will do it. Does this make sense to you? She wants to just leave it until the cash surrender value runs out then make it lapse ( about 10 years). I said if that's what she wants to do might as well take the money out now. If you have enough money saved for retirement and can afford to pay premiums, would you do it?

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
joyfulguy

Hi jet ny,

Basically, insurance companies are betting that we're going to live ... and we're betting that we're gonna die (sooner, rather than later). And the insurance companies have the actuaries, i.e. guys/gals who figure life expectancy.

Does your friend lack the money to pay the annual premium?

As the insurance company is charging 8.25% interest, it seems to me that she might be able to make a loan from her local financial institution at a lower rate, if she has good collateral. She could even use the insurance policy.

As it's true that, if she lives 30 years, she'll have paid only $75,000., her accountant knows that such is only part of the story.

If she invests $2,500. at 5%, and is in 20% income tax rate, she'll have 4% after paying tax, or $100. after one year.

Then she'd have that $2,600. to leave invested, plus another $2,500., for total $5,100. to invest next year, producing $204. in the following year. After 30 years, that fund would grow to quite a lot more than $75,000.

On the other hand, since her beneficiaries are to be the ones to benefit from leaving the insurance policy operational, perhaps they'd be interested to pay the premiums through the intervening years?

Provided, of course, that your friend wouldn't be worried that they might want to poison her ... to stop the outflow, and provide quite a large inflow of funds.

Just some ideas of various paths that she might choose.

ole joyful

    Bookmark   July 6, 2007 at 2:27AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
tom418

Is the policy a "Par" policy i.e. does it pay dividends? (It sounds like it is, since the death benefit exceeds the face amount.)

Many times, especially if a policy has been in force awhile, the annual dividends exceed the premium. Then one can use the dividends to pay the premium. New York Life calls this "POP" (Premium offset Proposal) .

Drawback would be: Dividends are not guaranteed, and death benefit would stop increasing.

    Bookmark   July 6, 2007 at 11:05AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jkom51

Yet another example of why your best buy in life insurance is a level term product....a level term for 20 years at age 55 would have cost her about $600/yr for $300K insurance. Oh, well!

>>If you have enough money saved for retirement and can afford to pay premiums, would you do it?Yes, IF I wanted to leave an sum of money to someone and think if I might use up all my own liquid assets by the time I die. A woman age 62 has a current estimated lifespan of another 27 years. Wait another ten years, and that will grow by another 5 years at least, so her money needs to last a good 30 years, at a minimum.

The question is really, why does she have this insurance? Generally at retirement, insurance has a limited usefulness if your heirs are grown and supporting themselves.

If her estate is sizable, she would be much, much better off establishing a proper living trust with pour-over will. Most attorneys make this a package with power of attorney and healthcare power of attorney (make sure it includes a HIPAA release!) for a reasonable flat fee.
Life insurance is part of estate planning, but it should be done properly, not "I hope this takes care of everything."

However it turns out, you might want to remind your friend that although life insurance is not taxed as income tax to the beneficiaries, there are some gift tax considerations to be considered in the overall value of the estate.

Note that if your friend dies in 2010, and ONLY in 2010, there will be no estate tax due no matter how large her estate is. Obviously since she canÂt guarantee that, her estate planning must consider how the insurance proceeds work in conjunction with her individual situation.
However, in 2011, if and only if, Congress does nothing, the estate tax limit plummets back down to $600K. Anything over that will get socked with up to 45% in estate taxes, and in certain situations that may include the insurance.

IÂm terrible with numbers, so IÂll let someone else do an analysis of your friendÂs options. I just wanted to point out sometimes there are other aspects of the situation to consider rather than just straight numbers-crunching.

BTW, donÂt depend on a tax advisor for estate planning advice. Use your tax advisor for tax considerations, but estate planning, especially in the US with the current changing estate tax rules, is not a job for the amateur  and Âamateurs include anyone who isnÂt a licensed financial planner (including me!).

Here is a link that might be useful: White paper on Insurance in Estate Planning

    Bookmark   July 6, 2007 at 4:39PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
epi117

It would seem like if she took the 30 k from closing the policy and invested it, bought a term life policy naming kids as getting benefits and than investing the future payments in a no load mutual fund that she would be better off.

ThatÂs just my theory; I have no financial training etc

Good luck

    Bookmark   July 10, 2007 at 5:24PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jkom51

Yes, but taking the policy proceeds and buying a term life policy would depend upon her current state of health. Admittedly $30K is a good sum to pay premiums with, even on a 15- or 20-yr level term policy, but if she has had any serious health problems, or any mental health problems at all, she might be effectively uninsurable now.

Without knowing more details, it's really not possible to advise one way or another.

    Bookmark   July 10, 2007 at 7:54PM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Programmable Thermostat proof
Does anyone have hard copy proof of the savings that...
rjexit5
Spending Breakdown
My wife and I have tracked our spending over the last...
rjexit5
Evicting
Don't know where to post this specifically. The thing...
Curt D'Onofrio
Buying a new house financial questions?
This seems silly, but I don't have anyone else to talk...
Butternut
Just because you pay your bills on time.....
doesn't guarantee you have good credit The "Paying...
myfask
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™