Trust nightmares

marge727April 25, 2008

I would like to know if what I am seeing in my practice is a trend across the country or not.

I have two cases this week where the successor trustee-- has decided to distribute the money and property quite differently from the way the parents laid out in their trust and will. He wants to make it "more fair". The parents in one case wanted to do more for the youngest son that worked in the family business and has a big family. Unfortunately they picked the oldest son to be the trustee.

In the other case, a sister has decided to divide evenly among her sisters even including the one the parents disinherited because she has a serious drug habit. At least the trustee isn't the druggie. (I've seen that too)

What is going on?

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
patser

Is that legal for the successor trustee to change the distributions like that?

    Bookmark   April 25, 2008 at 3:23PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
joyfulguy

If the trustee chooses to distribute assets in a way that's contrary to the provisions that were set out in the instruction document ...

... it seems to me that s/he'd better hope that no one chooses to challenge the way in which s/he chose to make those distributions ...

... 'cause if someone does - I hope that the trustee has pretty deep pockets (or doesn't mind living in a much smaller house ... or maybe a rental?).

And travel using a bicycle or transit.

ole joyful

    Bookmark   April 25, 2008 at 3:45PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
lucy

It's illegal as far as I know!

    Bookmark   April 25, 2008 at 6:38PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
marge727

Well the problem is that Trusts have no court supervision. So the objecting heir has to go into court, pay for their own attorney and seek an order from a judge. I know how to solve the problem, and we do see it frequently in court. What I was asking is--does this happen often in your area? I know how often it is happening in SoCal courts because thats where I practice.

    Bookmark   April 25, 2008 at 7:43PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
joyfulguy

When I re-read your original post just now, I realized that I hadn't answered your question.

Unfortunately, I have no answer for you, for I don't know, one way or the other.

Sorry.

ole joyful

    Bookmark   April 25, 2008 at 9:19PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
quandary

Often laypeople who are appointed as trustees don't understand the fiduciary concept. I know that people like to use trusts to avoid probate, but probate does provide more protection for having your wishes carried out. Probate also has a cleansing effect in that creditors must present their claims or are barred from asserting them (proper notice is required). Probate is not always expensive and does have its advantages. Trusts certainly have their place, but I think they've been oversold.

Trusts can be very useful in estate tax planning, but using a trust solely to avoid probate is not always wise.

    Bookmark   April 25, 2008 at 11:08PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jkom51

I think this is a problem that is going to grow over time. Trusts were really oversold in the last twenty years. With the easing of estate taxes most trusts aren't necessary.

Many people do not truly understand the issues of trustee fiduciary responsibilities, from either side of the equation. As far as I know (state laws differing as they do) it is up to the other heirs to bring suit against the trustee if they feel the trustee has failed his/her fiduciary duty. Expensive, yes; which is why people should give more thought to who they designate as trustee. It is a situation ripe for petty abuse.

I remember hearing an old proverb - "Never say you know a man until you have split an inheritance with him." Still true!

    Bookmark   April 26, 2008 at 12:14PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
duluthinbloomz4

I can't comment on the idea that trusts have been oversold. I've had dealings with three trusts and am convinced they keep things simple and tidy in a time when you don't want complicated and messy. There was no oversight as to the distribution, successor trustee was not required to make any kind of accounting but so as to avoid even the slightest hint of impropriety, the trusts were dealt with as written. Simple and no grounds for challenge.

I imagine it all becomes less clear cut (with a trust it could be as much a moral issue as a legal one) when there are true special needs or when someone's perceived "special needs" aren't fulfilled by a bequest or when too many people know the terms before hand and are quibbling about or dividing up the estate and getting to despise each other while the benefactor is still alive. Money and the idea of inheriting money can really turn some people.

The trust is a very good vehicle when and if it's the right one for you. Always extremely wise, as noted above, to pick a successor trustee you can trust without reservation. If someone's uncomfortable or incapable of acting as trustee, they can always resign - their appointment isn't chisled in stone - in favor of another person or institution who is.

Not being in the legal profession, it'd be a little difficult to see any trends in this. In my family, and now with a host of deceased elderly relatives, I've never known of any challenge to a will or trust.

    Bookmark   April 26, 2008 at 3:47PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
chisue

One should not hope to manage from the grave, whether by will or trust.

    Bookmark   April 26, 2008 at 4:35PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jkom51

Working in a financial planner's office, I've known of several serious family disputes over trusts. It's a real nightmare all the way around for everyone.

The reason I feel trusts have been oversold is the example of my in-laws. They didn't really need a trust, they only have one child! Totally unnecessary, could have just as easily been spelled out in a will. Inheritance spouse to spouse would have been LESS trouble than the trust was. Their list of successor trustees and contingent beneficiaries was 25 years out of date. It took six hours of consultation between us, my MIL, and the estate attorney to figure out the best way of getting them updated, since half the estate was now Irrevocable.

Yes, we have a trust ourselves. But we have no children, which as our estate attorney pointed out, actually complicates matters. We have designated two people as heirs, one of whom isn't blood related at all. At the same time we are disinheriting people who have equal or stronger blood relationships to us.

What our experience with my MIL's trust has taught us is that keeping one's trust updated is critical, and far too easily overlooked. Trusts do not work on common sense, they work according to the LAW, and this can trip up a lot of folks unwittingly.

    Bookmark   April 29, 2008 at 12:07PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
mariend

In some states, the trustees still have to file papers with an attorney and get the stuff approved by a court. Usually the attorney looks the will over, help file papers, present the will for probate etc. And if he/she sees anything unusual they will check it out. I had to do this in CA. I could not just change things around.

    Bookmark   May 1, 2008 at 1:31AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
marys1000

Don't wills also have a "trustee"?

    Bookmark   May 6, 2008 at 7:30PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
duluthinbloomz4

Wills have a designated (or appointed) "executor".
Trusts have a "trustee".

The term executor is used for the person responsible for handling the probate of an estate. Probate involves the court overseeing the distribution of the estate according to the person's Will.

A trustee is the person responsible for managing a Trust. A trust is a separate legal entity formed prior to death in order to avoid probate.

    Bookmark   May 7, 2008 at 10:26AM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
What is the fair ratio?
The living expense is paid between the couple (Husband...
azmom
anyone had trouble getting an Amex card accepted?
I have an Amex card with a very good cashback program,...
davidrt28 (zone 7)
Experience as a 1-car couple?
We moved into a new home (my first real house with...
ayimera
How would I sell fur coats?
Let me say, first, please donÂt bash me for having...
linnea56
Accounting Question
I was hoping there'd be an accounting forum her on...
andrelaplume2
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™