Shouldn't the inspector have found a rodent INFESTATION?
Our contractor is SHOCKED that the inspector didn't make a bigger deal (and we can't remember aything other than a passing notation) - our new house is INFESTED with rats. Thousands of dollars to remove floors and ceilings, clean crawlspaces, etc. My question really is don't you think an inspector should have made a big, big deal out of that? Is it really so hard to know whe you're eperienced? The holes the rats have to get into the house are HUGE HUGE HUGE and we didn't notice them because we didn't have to - we felt the inspector would do his job and we could rely on his findings...what do you think?