GW Testing Easy Photo Uploading

magothyrivergirlMay 17, 2012

GW is testing 'Easy Uploading Photo on GW' on the Cooking Forum. Using this method, we no longer need to use Photobucket, etc.

Is this another way for GW to gain more control over what content (ads) we see from them, by allowing / enabling GW to load images?

Good or bad for us? Opinions? This is getting rave reviews.

While I like the simplicity, I don't think I like unblocking and allowing all GW images. Are my concerns valid?

Here is a link that might be useful: Photo Uploading Testing - Cooking Forum - GW

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

I think it is a great idea myself. Never having the need to join any photo storage sites myself I can only see this as a positive step.

They are restricting the photos/images to 250kb in size which is still very generous.

    Bookmark   May 17, 2012 at 11:08AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
ravencajun Zone 8b TX

It's a great new option, and I have not had to un block any thing, I have firefox with adblock plus and easylist, so no need to see the ads.
The reason for them to do this is so they can try to control the size of the picture files people are adding to their posts. The new option has a size limit. This is a good thing. When someone includes a huge file it can seriously slow down page load speed and for those on dialup that can make access frustratingly slow.

My guess is that you may have some thing else blocked like java?

I am very happy to see this new option and hope they work out the bugs and get it implemented.

    Bookmark   May 17, 2012 at 11:17AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

Thanks! I value your opinions and defer to your expertise!
I appreciate your answers.

Raven - I had to unblock - GW load Images in java. It took me a long time to find it.

    Bookmark   May 17, 2012 at 11:30AM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo

It's fine for those who don't use a photo-hosting site, but I love Smugmug and have no desire to jump through GW hoops to post a pic.

    Bookmark   May 20, 2012 at 12:22PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
Richard (chuggerguy)

I also agree it's fine for those that don't use a photo-hosting site. Or even those who do that just wants to quickly and easily add an image to a post.

I'm picky/funny/strange though, so I host my own. I probably use a script pretty similar to what gardenweb uses but instead of automatically inserting the image into the post, it just returns the image code. If the image is wider than 640px it creates a smaller more web-friendly thumb which is linked to the full-sized image. So, it saves me typing, saves me having to manually create thumbs, and allows me to at least offer the full resolution image.

    Bookmark   May 22, 2012 at 2:22AM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
What's with this new Houzz thing?
Been away a couple days, and came back to this, what...
which tablet
Shopping for a friend's 11yr old GD who wants a 10"...
Someone have a link for free Chrome browser?
I have been having troubles downloading files from...
Win 8 network settings
I need to export my network settings to a flash drive...
Changing HOUZZ page appearance
I use Chrome browser and have an extension called Change...
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™